Threads by latest replies - Page 2362

(5 replies)
No.13730845 ViewReplyOriginalReport
If psychology isn't a real science, then does this mean IQ is pesudoscience?
(6 replies)
No.13730769 ViewReplyOriginalReport
what are the odds that a single dose 600mg ibuprofen will straight up kill you even if you're healthy?

pic unrelated
1 post omitted
(10 replies)

You will never be a number

No.13727675 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Even at inception, you were never going to be one or be used in any way that resembles a number.

You will always be seen as the scapegoat mechanism from disgraceful incompetant modern 'mathematicians' , a cancer so to speak

You are the anti- christ to all that is reasonable and logical, destroyer of proofs as some in theology would say

You are and will never not be the single reason we have not moved past 'figuring' out numbers and likely will never be done as long as a single inference to you is made.

In fact it is impossible to consider the number of langues L with all possible variations and extents to which you are involved by extended inferences to prove let alone one and thus the existance of a
successful - logically consistant theory of real numbers and we are only considering up to 'N' of these 'L' languages and more likely than not, will require 'divine' new insights from the creator himself to rigorously prove one
case and I wont even mention the sinful consequence according to your own nature on how many numbers exist within integers [a,b] even giving variations of 'countiblity' in literature making them next to meaningless and I only say 'next to' because it only logically follows in conjuction
with how offended I am therefore, it is within epsilon to meaningless since I am still offended.

You are responsible for the success of people like N.J Wildberger and anyone that pushes back against the system will be rewarded greatly beginning on the day - end of the cope- which officially marks
the end of an infinite dogmatic approach of learning but notice the "end of an infinite " is particularily cruel to those traitors and impossible to cope with.


In a truly cynical cruel twist of fate, the only aspect of this that will be 'infinite' are the punishment sentences to mental aslyums that every traitor to logic will be subject to, beginning on day 'end of the cope' which is at most finitely many days away.
5 posts and 1 image omitted
(10 replies)

What is science? is ID science?

No.13729705 ViewReplyOriginalReport
I tried this thread earlier and got banned, yet race, banter, IQ, and metaphysics threads that have almost zero discussion is somehow allowed. So i'll try again. Hoping the mods dont ban me.

I have never got an actual answer out of people who claim ID methods are not science. This is mostly due to misunderstandings

>any meaningful idea needs to be a consensus
Wrong, every scientific theory started with a few people believing it, if the idea is true, explanatory and rich it doesn't matter how many people believe it at any one time.

>Design detection and teleology is not valid in science
Only if you philosophically presuppose the answer before you attempt to answer the question. ID schemes offer the possibility of teleology in the world. If darwinist naturalism is a scientific result, it must be possible for it to be wrong.

>ID doesn't explain anything
Wrong, you can use information theoretic methods to study many things that are not explanatory using strictly materialistic methods. Cryptography, Archaeology, forensics, cyber security and even SETI all use ID methods that were specified by people like Dembski. All of these fields consistently use design detection according to information theoretical methods and consistently produce new results.

>The only think that exists is matter and energy, information is projected onto the world by the human mind
This is a philosophical disagreement, give me a reason why information cant exist but things like entropy and energy can. There can just as well be a law of conservation of information as a law of conservation of energy.

>Its just religion
No, its completely areligious. It is also only metaphysical in the sense that more things can possibly exist under an ID framework. Instead of only chance and necessity, teleology is now a third option. This is almost identical to what ancient greek scientists thought, and their religious views were very different then mainstream religion today.
5 posts omitted
(5 replies)
No.13730840 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Is getting a masters in public health worth it? Has anyone here got one?
(5 replies)
No.13730852 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Is there any accessible medicine to take after getting the vaccine that reduces the risk of myocarditis? Is there a difference between taking it in one arm or the other?
>this is not a political thread, I'm actually scared as fuck. Need to take the second dose of Pfizer next week.
(5 replies)
No.13727191 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Scientifically speaking, why does shit like this happen?
(20 replies)
No.13727298 ViewReplyOriginalReport
All the important scientific discoveries have already been made
15 posts and 2 images omitted
(18 replies)
No.13725997 ViewReplyOriginalReport
So what are the chances when you die it just goes back to birth?
13 posts omitted
(5 replies)