Threads by latest replies - Page 2330

(93 replies)
No.13728381 ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
Free will? What are the implications?
https://vimeo.com/75647511

>pic related
>what’s the right answer?
88 posts and 5 images omitted
(13 replies)

vaccines are seatbelts

No.13740033 ViewReplyOriginalReport
>why the vaccine dont work?
oh i guess you wont put a seatbelt because its not saving you 100% of the time right?
>why do we have to casually consume the vaccine every 6 months?
oh i guess you wont put a seatbelt either since you need to put it every time you go to a ride
>why the fuck should we get a non standard vaccine that tested only for 1 fucking year?!
oh i guess you wont put a seatbelt because there is no side effect studies for the last 300 years

vaccines are not like seatbelts, they are fucking seatbelts!
8 posts and 3 images omitted
(5 replies)
(19 replies)

Cigarettes

No.13739500 ViewReplyOriginalReport
What's with all the anti-smoking propaganda everywhere? I feel like it's very hard to find objective non biased studies on this matter, all you find is ridiculously nonsensical stats like "90% of smokers regret having started smoking"
Unironically what's their endgame?
Nicotine isn't even addictive (from my personal experience as well as two of my friends which is basically 100% of the planet's population)
14 posts and 1 image omitted
(140 replies)
No.13736703 ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
hi 4chan smarty pants, female here, what do you have to say about the wobbly MUON discovery that was made a few months back, are we getting new phsysics, what are the current theories? that is all, oh and yeah HOPE EVERYONE IS FEELING OK :)
135 posts and 19 images omitted
(27 replies)

.

No.13735099 ViewReplyOriginalReport
22 posts and 3 images omitted
(8 replies)

Indirect proof

No.13739757 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Consider we want to prove that
>if p, then q
through indirect proof

then we should be proving
>not q therefore not p

is this sufficient for a proof of the intial proposition?
3 posts omitted
(33 replies)
No.13733539 ViewReplyOriginalReport
I understand the math in this paradox but morally it doesn't make any sense. Imagine Monty opening the door BEFORE you made the initial choice and then asking you to choose a door. Suddenly it becomes 50% as it should be. Exact same situation as in the paradox: 1 door open, 2 doors to choose from. Explain this.
28 posts and 3 images omitted
(14 replies)

not a troll

No.13737445 ViewReplyOriginalReport
how do you solve this /sci/
9 posts and 3 images omitted
(16 replies)
No.13738998 ViewReplyOriginalReport
How do you fix it?
11 posts and 2 images omitted