She needs our help bros!

What have you actually accomplished? This board talks about random math problems, spews pseudoscience, jerks off about degrees sometimes...
What have you actually accomplished? Have you designed a medical device that has saved lives? Have you built a company/designed a patent that you sold for a considerable sum? Have you found a new algorithm for anything that improved anything for real users?
Or do you just like the idea of science and math more than you like doing it?

>thinking you're smart when you're not good at math

>Betelgeuse
>One of the easiest stars to see in the sky
>Been studied for centuries
>Still no idea how far away it is
>Huge uncertainties in measurements
Why are astrono-nerds like this?

molnupiravir may end Covid-19

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-10-11/merck-seeks-emergency-use-authorization-for-pill-to-treat-covid


https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34159342/

>Conclusions: Molnupiravir is the first oral, direct-acting antiviral shown to be highly effective at reducing nasopharyngeal SARS-CoV-2 infectious virus and viral RNA and has a favorable safety and tolerability profile.
>Results: Among 202 treated participants, virus isolation was significantly lower in participants receiving 800 mg molnupiravir (1.9%) versus placebo (16.7%) at Day 3 (p = 0.02). At Day 5, virus was not isolated from any participants receiving 400 or 800 mg molnupiravir, versus 11.1% of those receiving placebo (p = 0.03)

When can I use asymptotic substitution in sum/differences? I don't get it

I'll start.

Any good sciency stuff about habitual environments, possibility and the whatnot?

Do any of you study virology?

I can't be the only one around here that thinks formal education is garbage, or am I?
Why am I forced to sit through 90min of a monologue from which I won't learn anything, sometimes 4 times per day?
In my country the professors don't even work examples, it's just theorem after theorem thrown at you.
The only way to understand these (according to my experience) is to work with concrete examples, to derive the proofs yourselves, obviously I can't do that in a lecture where I can't go at my own pace and of course to work problems yourself, in which already solved problems can come in very hand the procedural knowledge from.
Most learning is you sitting down with a piece of paper, so why focus on non-interactive instruction like that?
Just give me a textbook in the 20th edition and that is it, no need to throw a half-assed lecture at me.