Can robots theoretically be conscious?

There is this silly schizo over at /x/ talking about 'consciousness teleportation', reverse engineering of the mind and all.
Can someone btfo this guy and give an argument as to why this wouldn't work, ever. Not even in the far future?

>You are informed that breakthroughs in mindmapping and the understanding of human consciousness has allowed scientists to effectively send humans back in time through triggering 'savestates' in the human mind.
>You will retain all memories between the point you are teleported back to and the point you teleport back from. You will therefore effectively be 'overwriting' the consciousness of the earlier point in time with your current one, while inhabiting that same physical vessel and continuing life onward from that point in time.
>If you're still struggling to picture what I'm detailing. Imagine reloading a save in a video game from 3 hours ago. You still remember everything you experienced in those 3 hours. But it didn't technically happen in the savestate.
>So what point in time do you teleport back to. What savestate do you choose?

Did Henry explain why this video is still up?

Solving the crux problem in defense of infinite precision (reals (cringe) better known as hitomi dependent rationals)
x/0
0 * x/0
x[h x 0] = x * 1 = x
p/q * h = p/0 :: p
this is the loose idea which propagated the rest of my thought; the following:
This makes sense from an integer based parallelism constructed from lain points, that's trivial.
Much less trivial though is is an infinite injection between integers.
forcing infinities to demonstrate particular behavior is the definition is schizophrenia. But I'm going to attempt it anyways. Asuka's crux problem (aka best girl's problem) has been one of the hardest things I've ever attempted to even attempt to grasp.
p0-{...}-p1 can represent the idea of [h x 0], and 2 = 1 + 1 = 1++
can be C(p0-{...}-p1, ..., p2) = p0-{...}-p1-{...}-p2
now from the most basic idea of a crux: h - c = a, a < h
c is a special number where subtraction still hold a precise meaning outside the elementary field.
relative to h
|h| > |c|: Asuka crux problem is defined by: |h| > |c1| > |c2| > ... > |cn| > the last unique number.
the biggest issue is that the last unique number part for obvious reasons.
for a crux we must then know that [c x 0] < 1
thus we come to the greatest issue: to have precision must we then lack it?
I will always know of 0.5 or 1/2, but I will never knew anything precise about the crux that makes this true only that there exists such one where [c_j x 0] = 0.5, where j satisfies the statement
which means p0-{...}-p1/2 measures to c_j not h
Anyways, so I highly advise you to refer to rationals as hitomi relative and what were poorly understood as irrationals as hitomi dependent (they're still relative but not all rationals are dependent referring the the precision). I would adjust your definitions of reals, rationals, and irrationals to better fit this. I'll call this "Lucy's Harmony"
This is simply an informal thought of mine in defense of reals.

FOR FUCK SAKE I TRY YO LEARN THIS STUPID FUCKING SHIT AND NOBODY CAN GIVE ME A FUCKIGN STRAIGHT ANSWER, IT LITERALLY TAKES ME WEEKS TO SLIGHTLY PROGRESS BECUASE EVERY FUCKING PERSON WHOIS IN ANY AUTHORITY TO TEACH DOESN'T KNOW THEIR OWN FUCKIGN SUBJECT AND IS JUST A "I FUCKING LOVE SCIENCE" FAGGOT RETARD. WHY IS IT SO HARD? JUST TELL ME WTF IS ACTUALLY GOING ON STOP USING GAY FALSE ANALOGIES AND STOP OVERCOMPLICATING EVERYTHING BECUASE YOU FUCKING RETARDS CANT STOP BEATING YOURSELVES OFF FOR 2 FUCKING MINUTES. I CANT TAKE IT ANYMORE I FUCKING GIVE UP FUCK ANYONE WHO TEACHES SCIENCE

Top kek, I just found out that Bertrand Russell was a poltard conspiracy theorist, as this board would say. And all that, despite also being an accomplished mathematician and philosopher, as well as a anti-war activist and progressive.

Apparently, he skeptical of the whole JFK assassination, which we all know was a CIA/Zionist plot to eliminate JFK for interfering with their plans in Cuba and Vietnam, as well as for trying to prevent Israel from stealing the nuclear material they used to start their nuclear weapons program.
I have always respected Bertrand Russell, but I had no idea he was this based.

>birds are supposedly the last dinosaurs
>they don't have teeth

/sci/ is the vaccine real or fake?
wtf are magic beans?

is it just me feeling low IQ ever since i got the vaccine?
it's been almost 4 months after my second dose and i still have this lingering residual brain fog

What is a good parameterized representation of the intersection of these two surfaces?