Threads by latest replies - Page 184

(5 replies)

Magic is real.

No.14382666 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Due to the “observed quantum state” phenomenon, all scientists can agree that there’s an abstract that is all and above all concepts. I like to call it Love.
Also it also implies that all statements and choices are essential magic and of an intangible quality.

One could say that all is completely made up and what you/god chooses it to be. Because you are god. And the only force that creates a consistent state is love.
(47 replies)

Mushrooms can speak

No.14374556 ViewReplyOriginalReport
What are they talking about?
42 posts and 12 images omitted
(17 replies)

Was Oppenheimer another fraud?

No.14371315 ViewReplyOriginalReport
I don't know enough yet to say but was doing some reading and some things about him are very suspicious.

I know he's from a very powerful banking family.

He tried to poison his goy teacher out of jealousy:

"In 1924, Oppenheimer was accepted into studies at the prestigious Christ’s College of the University of Cambridge as a theoretical physicist. Here, he was placed under the tutelage of Patrick Blackett, an experimental physicist later made famous for his work on cosmic rays and paleomagnetism. This was not a successful pairing; due to his own ineptitude in the laboratory, Oppenheimer became envious of Blackett’s skills as an experimental physicist. Indeed, Oppenheimer initially wished to study experimental physics, but was prevented from doing so because of his “clumsiness” in the lab.

In 1926, in a fit of psychological despair while on vacation in Corsica, Oppenheimer confessed to his two accompanying friends that he had to return to Cambridge immediately. The reason? Before he had left for vacation, he had coated an apple in noxious laboratory chemicals and placed it on Blackett’s desk. Oppenheimer wanted to make sure that Blackett was alright.

Fortunately, he was. Unfortunately, the university’s administration had been informed of his little “prank” and intended to press charges, because prestigious institutions like Cambridge usually look down on students murdering the faculty. It was only through the intervention of his parents that Oppenheimer wasn’t charged; indeed, he was placed on academic probation and ordered to undergo regular psychiatric evaluations. Finally, at the end of 1926, Oppenheimer left Cambridge at the invitation of Max Born to study theoretical physics at the University of Gottingen."
12 posts and 3 images omitted
(216 replies)

What's the /sci/'s general consensus regarding vaccination?

No.14378730 ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
Sound science or deleterious garbage?
211 posts and 15 images omitted
(5 replies)

Government Tracking

No.14382278 ViewReplyOriginalReport
My neighbor that works in a very high branch of the government, told me yesterday that the only way to stop the government from tracking you through either your phone or the vaccine is: to drink or eat very minimal amounts of mercury daily. Twice a day if you're around large groups of people that have their phones turned on.
(25 replies)

Can we talk about schizophrenia

No.14378518 ViewReplyOriginalReport
What medication is the best and why has there been seemingly no progress in understanding the disease
20 posts and 3 images omitted
(5 replies)
No.14381571 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Depending on ph scaling (aquafina being about 5.5), what kind of effect would drinking plastic bottles on a regular basis for 2 years straight have on the human brain?

Just asking for research purposes, in case anyone is curious on how the human brain is affected whenever a lack of a decent tap water source isn't around for anybody to drink from.
(7 replies)
No.14381528 ViewReplyOriginalReport
>TIL Gorillas have lower Testosterone than the average human man
Are hormone levels a meme?
2 posts omitted
(11 replies)
No.14381689 ViewReplyOriginalReport
did any of you know boolean algebra?

do i did it right?
6 posts and 1 image omitted
(10 replies)
No.14381840 ViewReplyOriginalReport
>ingesting drugs that were only just invented within the past 50 years
I seriously hope you guys don't do this
And this isn't even an "appeal to old = good fallacy", it's simply impossible to get an accurate idea of the effects of something that hasn't been on the market for more than a couple of generations. It isn't enough time to even prove safety, let alone efficacy.
5 posts omitted