Threads by latest replies - Page 1086
Anonymous (10 replies)
how can i chemically induce autism to myself?
srs replies only. i want to experience autism.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
High fructose corn syrup, eat only the cheapest, shittiest foods with additives, watch anime, play video games, don't exercise. These are literally the cause of autism
Anonymous
>>14117236 Infertile femboys have a very high rate of autism
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>14114506 Meth. Though I don't recommend it.
Anonymous
Anonymous (17 replies)
>getting vaccinated
>for a virus with 99.9...% survival rate
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>14118631 so thats the vaxx out of the way, and now describe covid
Viruses don't exist
Quoted By:
>>14118631 shill, that is potent weed
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>14117801 This. Never isolated from a sick person and used to infect an animal/person. They couldn't prove it exists
Anonymous
>>14117791 flu 60,000 per year
covid 400,000
let me guess anon, you did your own research?
Viruses don't exist
Quoted By:
>>14120127 shill seething: 800 000 000 per year. let me guess, $3 per comment?
Anonymous (12 replies)
What do you guys think about metaphysics ?
Is it really the number one science ?
Is it even a serious science ?
If so what is to expect from it in the future ?
Or do you think It is not a science but a religion ?
If it is a religion why would you care about it ?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>14118785 >Do you even know what science is >unfalsifiable and therefore beyond the scope of science Neither do you
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>metaphysics Isn't "philosophy" the more commonly used term?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>Metaphysics seeks to answer, in an abstract and fully general manner, the questions: 1. What is there? 2. What is it like? Topics of metaphysical investigation include existence, objects and their properties, space and time, cause and effect, and possibility. >space >time >causality Today, sci learns that metaphysics is literally just physics. Seethe.
Anonymous
the meta-physics boards are /lit/ and /his/ in addition /x/ may pretend to dabble in meta-physics from time to time the occasional poem does not count as meta-physical content
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>14120161 >meta-physics Stop any time.
Anonymous (30 replies)
Question for Particle Physicists, Chemists, and/or Material Scientists
Have we come close to figuring out how to predict interactions for new isotopes or "new elements" before observing them?
What do we know about the relationship between an element's subatomic composition versus it's macro scale properties ?
Anonymous
Anonymous
>>14113982 >What do we know about the relationship between an element's subatomic composition versus it's macro scale properties ? Macroscale properties outside of radioactivity are entirely determined by the charge and mass of the nucleus. In terms of first principles - it is actually really fucking hard. What you can do are things like solve the schrodinger equation for the case of a nucleus with the amount of electrons equal to the charge of the nucleus(and that is ignoring relativity, which makes things way harder) and extrapolate that adding more electrons will just fill up the higher energy levels, which gives you the periodic table and other heuristical things. This is what gives you the highschool chemistry picture of what is happening. You can go beyond that, but the difficulty of actually doing anything from first principle becomes insane. This is why people want to do things like build quantum computers, because those provide good tools to just solve big quantum mechanical problems in basic chemistry numerically.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>14118417 >>14118221 I like these answers.
This is more what I am looking for.
-OP
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>14113982 Look into the kinetic isotope effect. Used in physical organic chemistry. Essentially means that fatter atoms react more slowly (they're at a kinetic disadvantage).
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>14117296 It is simple philosophy of science... All predictions must arrive from observation since there is no such thing as a priori knowledge of the natural world. All such knowledge comes from previous observations.
We create these models of the atoms based on our observations... which we then use to predict new observations. But the primary part of their creation is the observations, not the atoms themselves.
For more on this subject you should read Hume.
Anonymous (29 replies)
what is the second most intelligent species to ever exist on this planet? where do you guys think modern great apes are going to evolve, if they all dont go extinct?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>14118128 Number one is pure blooded goblins, who can only be summoned by spilling the blood of an infant, preferably through circumcision.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>14118686 >You goblins are not capable of understanding why subjugating other nations causes not respect by contempt They are capable of understanding it, it's just not strategical to admit it. They understand it well enough that, despite making up less than 0.2% of the population, they have outmaneuvered the entire world. Your race has billions of people, and yet you cry your way to bed everyday because of the power jews have over your nation.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>14115813 It isn't the size that counts but the ratio between brain mass and body mass.
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
HUMANS ARE ONLY SMART BECAUSE OF LANGUAGE. without language we would just be an extra witty ape
Anonymous (5 replies)
do you like looking at a scientist?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Praise Twum. Everyone be silent a black woman is speaking
Anonymous (25 replies)
>never took physics in my life
>now my degree requires me to take a physics class
Is it like math where I should focus on solving problems and not focusing on understanding every part of topic?
Can you recommend me resources (textbooks, useful sites, youtube channels) for an absolute newbie?
Thx
Anonymous
>>14117827 From what you've told me you're essentially going to be given the "light" version of of an Intro physics course. You won't be doing the more involved subject material, like solving a determinate to find torque or angular momentum.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>14117845 Alright, that's good to hear. Although you guys are all nerds so i wouldn't know how light "light" is.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>14113109 Maybe University Physics. I don't normally recommend it, but it covers all those topics and IIRC doesn't involve calculus (at least not much).
Anonymous
>>14112671 We had a prof who asked "any questions?" Someone asked a genuine question about the completely new subject and the answer was "if you don't know this, you should rather be planting potato somewhere". Sure dude, our apologies that you actually have to teach something.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>14119983 Thank you sirs for the anecdote.
Anonymous (5 replies)
How does positron emission require energy and where does this energy come from? it converts a proton into a neutron and a neutron has greater mass than a proton.
Anonymous (5 replies)
Is it healthy for a sexually submissive man to become a sexual dominant?
Anonymous
obsession with sex is not healthy
Anonymous
>>14116884 >obsession with sex is not healthy thread
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>14116871 No, he should become a sexually submissive woman instead
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>healthy What, you think mixing up your sex life will give you diabetes or something?
Sage Northcutt
Anonymous (5 replies)
scientifically speaking, what is the probability that this piece of shit explodes?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>14119729 Low enough it would be the equivalent of Apollo 13.