Threads by latest replies - Page 805

(25 replies)
No.14202892 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Ninety per cent of women whose unborn babies are diagnosed with Down's syndrome choose to have an abortion
20 posts and 3 images omitted
(5 replies)
(5 replies)

Scientific explanation for consciousness

No.14202758 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Human consciousness a.k.a. "the soul" is a physical manifestation of heat. The geometry is invertible from our "outside" point of view to its "inside" point of view. There could be a third layer connected to pure space. Not much has been studied/conjectured about the way we affect space "the other way." Thoughts/Questions?
(134 replies)
No.14200677 ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
When did you realize he was right all along?
129 posts and 11 images omitted
(5 replies)
(5 replies)

Help Kazakhbro

No.14201859 ViewReplyOriginalReport
>Lake Koshkar-Ata
>Turned into massive Kazakh uranium mine that was opened in the 1960s
>Able to produce as much uranium as 30 smaller uranium mines
>The government also started dumping shit tons of radioactive and chemical waste into it
>105 million tons of uranium mining waste
>Mice found near the lake have genetic mutations
>Why was this lake green in 2019 but became dark red like in the video https://youtu.be/Nip_HpzCuZk during 2021.
(58 replies)

DMED Data:

No.14194574 ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
Defense Medical Epidemiology Database shows huge increase of diseases in service members post vaccine. Several pathologists running large labs have said the data falls inline with what they are seeing in the general population for increased cancer rates. Any cancer fags here seeing increased rates in your own work?
53 posts and 8 images omitted
(12 replies)
No.14203921 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Scientifically speaking, why do mutts lack spatial awareness and the ability to form original thought?
7 posts omitted
(24 replies)

Super enery dense batteries are a scam and so are most EVs

No.14202352 ViewReplyOriginalReport
What you see in the picture is 18650 lithium ion battery; if you own a laptop, it probably has a bunch of these inside. Its energy density ranges from 0.9 MJ/L to 2.63 MJ/L, compared to the 34 MJ/L of gasoline. Even with that relatively small energy density, when pierced or smashed these batteries will burst into flames and get red hot immediately. If we were to create a battery that held as much energy as any common fuel, we would not only have a battery but also a revolutionary explosive: TNT only holds 6.9 MJ per liter. Imagine multiplying that by 6. If you were driving an electric car with this batteries, crashing it will obliterate you off existence. HMX, one of the most powerful know explosives, has 10 MJ/L
Of course, I could be generous and imagine that we can allow the batteries to take up more volume and be less energy dense, but still, modern cells are already very dangerous and are very hard to put out, see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IXbYh8UkbRI.
The cause of these differences is that fuels "store" their energy not only within them, but also within surrounding air. You need to vaporize the fuel and mix it with the right amount of air to get the energy; a battery, however, very much like an explosive, "holds" all of its energy within itself.
Furthermore, if we entirely switched to EVs, the load on our electric grid would be and would require us to use several meter wide cables in cities.
19 posts and 2 images omitted
(12 replies)

Guys please listen to for the love of God PLEASE

No.14204075 ViewReplyOriginalReport
I know and understand gravity, and it is not what you think it is. It is not a universal or fundamental "force". It is an acceleration, but not one of matter. It is an acceleration of spacetime itself.

Please allow me to explain. Imagine that you are in a dragster that is accelerating forward with incredible force. You will be pressed into the back of the seat. Imagine that sensation. Now take the seat out of the dragster and set it on the ground on its back. Then sit in it. Imagine that sensation. It's the same sensation as accelerating forward.

Things that are "stationary" on the ground are accelerating upwards. But how can that be? We can see that they're not moving. What is happening is their frame of reference, their coordinate system, spacetime itself is accelerating past them toward the center of earth.

Let's say that spacetime flows into matter like a fluid, just accept that as a fact for now. It flows like a wide river flows into a narrow waterfall. As you get closer to the waterfall, the water must necessarily accelerate in order to accommodate the narrowing passage. In the same way, spacetime must accelerate as it approaches matter.
7 posts and 2 images omitted