Threads by latest replies - Page 733
Anonymous
Or 'dayta' as he calls it. All data is wrong, unless the sample is very small. Why is this retard making millions of views basing his views on published 'dayta'??? Why is he making any conclusive reasoning with incorrect numbers???
Anonymous
>>14228623 >Pro vaxxers only behave like NPCs because they took the vaxx, they used to be normal like us Interesting. It might really be affecting the brains.
>>14228833 >See what happened to Dr Norman Fenton (St Marys University London), multiple published cited papers over risk assessment. >The second he questioned the official NHS data wasn't adding up regarding vax vs uvax -> deplatformed) Get names of who works on those "platforms". Lists need to be made for future trials.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
I used to like this guy back in early 2020. He offered a glimmer of hope in a sea of darkness and despair. Now he is flirting way too closely with the "anti-mainstream" crowd, who basically ignore everything he says that doesn't conform to their views but fixate on the few things that are compatible with their agenda.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>14230483 Studies aren't true
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>14227565 what? medlife talked about him?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
yt man shook debunkin' ass punk chu mean fool racist ass
Anonymous
how come the human body cant regenerate? if you lost your face or a limb, it will never grow back
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>14230386 >just loose 40 punds by sewering off your left arm >keep that weight off by the struggle of growing it back kek
Anonymous
>>14229879 We already know one of the primary genes- P21. Knock it out in mice, you no longer get scar tissue, but proper regeneration and the ability to regenerate limbs.
The problem, as anyone who knows anything about p21, is cancer. Knockout p21, gain regeneration, and also gain spontaneous tumour formation and cell-cycle fuckups.
So you can gain superpowers but is it worth it to look like HEEEEEYY YYOOOOUU GUUUUYS
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>14231452 Basically nowhere history you can find widespread, persistent malnutrition like in the west today.
It doesn't matter we have a lot of food when the food is so poor in quality that it effectively won't feed you and people are constantly hungry in spite of eating.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>14231492 >Knock it out in mice, you no longer get scar tissue, but proper regeneration and the ability to regenerate limbs. That sounds very promising. I cut my finger pretty badly since I started taking heavy metals (cadmium is the most crucial for healing I believe) and it just fixed itself over time, no scar at all.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>14229954 Because scar tissue is better than growing back a limb for most injuries.
In the wild the most common type of injury is probably a scratch or gash. Healing it asap is best change at staving off infection.
So scar tissue was chosen over proper regeneration. In the unlikely event you lose an arm, your stub will scar over before it regrows.
Anonymous
He was and still is right /sci/ now apologize. The absurdity is most apparent in mathematics, It always makes me chuckle when I see some "mathematician" deriding the work of a "crank mathematician", like "Your work does not adhere to the common completely made up theoretical framework and instead adheres to its own completely made up theoretical framework and is therefore incorrect". I know they need their welfare check, but come on, it's just silly at this point. If you really cared about mathematics, you would be itching to learn about any new framework you came across.
Anonymous
>>14231617 Try coming up with better strawmen next time
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>14231618 Nice appeal to popularity
>>14231609 Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>14231586 >Aliens can't observe it >Can tell who wins That doesn't follow deterministically.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>14231586 The aliens can observe the game using human behavior as a medium.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>14230874 Didn't read the book, but the scientific method IS bullshit. Why? It shows over and over it lets you stuck in some random bullshit that is wrong, but hard to conclusively disprove. The "established fact" then accumulates layers and layers of convoluted explanations of why what should be overwhelming evidence against it actually doesn't disprove it at all. Thousand person years of work are wasted on something that should be thrown away long time ago. Instead, a different approach should be taken where all possible hypotheses are taken and experiments are made to distinguish between them. This also makes it easier to devise experiments that are valuable, as you know where the hypotheses differ, rather than having to test one hypothesis randomly.
Anonymous
>mfw finding out 5/6 of all STEM is unprofitable >Biology masters with IQ's of 150 and math phd's with IQ's of 165+ are making 1/4 of accountants with a basic cpa
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>14231530 >biology masters with Iqs of 150 That literally doesnt exist kek
Anonymous
> HE HAS BILLIONAIRES ON SPEEDDAIL > MILLIONS OF DOLLARS OF FUNDING > NERD CELEB TYPE CLOUT > DECENT LOOKING
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>14231347 This guy wins the thread.
Former virgin here. Takes one to know one.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>14231500 No way. There were plenty of attractive, cogent and intelligent women around he had plenty of opportunity with. He has some sort of mental block/issue when it comes to intimacy. Its not hard to imagine him melting and becoming too clingy without being able to help himself.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Considering he can barely keep a conversation going it's not hard to imagine. He just should have went with that portuguese guest he had the hots for and be done with it.
Frenanon
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>14231485 >joe rogan is 172cm (170cm according to the celebheights sperg) >lex is supposedly 175cm
Anonymous
As an engineer things breaking down is pretty normal. I don't know a single machinery that hasn't eventually broken down even when being maintained well. The concept is simple the more it's used, the more likely it will break down. Sometimes the fix is easy but the majority of the time it needs a new parts replacement from the factory. Now the question is how would a space ship be maintained or fixed when it breaks down especially being worn down by light speed? Like I wrote before you can't just fix something on the spot without getting a parts replacement from the factory.
Anonymous
>>14231434 Whatever method they use for FTL will have wear and tear. We're not talking about one day of space on FTL speed but years. You can't actually believe a piece of machinery traveling for years on the most extreme high speed known to our current physics wouldn't have any effect on the spaceship? What happens to our rockets when they get launched into space? Do they not get damaged by the launch into space?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>14231444 >You can't actually believe This is a matter of belief?
I haven't been intimated.
FTL travel (if there ever will be such a thing) won't even involve the concept of speed.
You can toss that notion right out of your head.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>14231425 just put the factory on the ship
simple
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>14231444 They get damaged going through the atmosphere, but in principle you could just build your spacecraft in orbit. Still, at super high speeds even small dust particles would do a lot of damage, so you'd just have to shield your ship a lot. Or there was that concept where a spacecraft would have a bunch of smaller drones in front of it to take the damage, you'd start off with a whole fleet and then they'd gradually get worn down, while hopefully keeping the main ship intact. And since the drones would be going the same speed as the ship, the collision with debris wouldn't be that bad
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>14231425 Look up "generation ships", all these things have been thought about by smart people that have come up with several viable solutions.
The easiest is just carry materials with you and make what you need as you need it. Another is capturing everything that hits the ship and using that, it really depends where you are going and what you are flying through to if this is an option. There is also capturing asteroids but this takes a lot of delta-v and time so you need a pretty good drive to make it viable.
There are also options like building a hab on an asteroid, attaching an engine and then maintaining / expanding en route with those raw materials.
If we ever get serious about manned interstellar we are going to be using something like Orion or a fusion torch so bringing a lot of mass isn't much of an issue.
Anonymous
>poisons the idea of nuclear energy in American culture for decades
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Nuclear is the only way we will leave fossil fuels behind. Renewables will never be a base energy source that can provide stable energy levels
Anonymous
>>14229129 I never saw the Simpsons as anti nuclear propaganda. Might as well see it as pro nuclear, there were never any bad accidents despite Homer.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>14230997 On many occasions the joke is that Homer is preposterously incompetent and uneducated for his position. The other nuclear plant employees are depicted as intelligent and hardworking.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>14229129 Will you reproach with Matt Groening now?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>14230853 >>14230997 >they've never had a meltdown! Yeah, they just depict neon green radioactive sludge, mutant fish in the lake, Homer having a low sperm count from being constantly exposed to radiation, etc. Those are the actual unfounded fears, people think that nuclear power plants belch out radiation and put literal nuclear runoff into water supplies.
Anonymous
Pic related, there are no elegant proofs for it (unless you use a Chi-squared distribution, which itself is based on a bunch of bullshit combinatorics proofs)
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Please elaborate
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Take measure theoretic probability and then mathematical statistics. Lots of real analysis.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
"In this sense, statistics is to probability as engineering is to physics - an applied science based on a more intellectually stimulating foundational discipline."
Anonymous
Continuing the tradition of creating generals for underappreciated /sci/ topic.
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>14229071 beans and raw garlic
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>5 years of experience + a bachelors degree in chem lands you $50k/y
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>14193673 biochem best chem
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>14195771 http://scipy-lectures.org/ , Learning Python by Mark Lutz, C++ Pocket Reference for rules because larger C++ books make me want to off myself.
>>14195438 MP2 overbinds hard. Modern functionals do a lot better than the old ones. Comparing MP2, said functionals, and double hybrids is a good exercise.
>>14204597 Frank Jensen, Christopher Cramer, Andrew Leach
>>14211920 In addition to the other good suggestions, Psi4
Anonymous
What is the evolutionary purpose of emotions? Common sense would dictate that emotions are what drive people to achieve more in their lives, but there are plenty of cases of emotionally dull psychos achieving more than most regular people. Are neurotypicals with plenty of complicated emotions destined to be phased out?
