Hi sci what the fuck am I looking at?

Say I wanted to make water reach temperatures of 100, and -100 deg c in a room of 25 deg c. How many known methods are there for the layman to achieve this?

Listen recent or soon to graduates to my words carefully. Never do test engineering. I worked as a test engineer since I graduated so about 5 years and now whenever I apply to places they push me into their test engineer position.
>it doesn't seem like you have the necessary skills for our development position however we would like you to look into our test engineer positions you would make a good fit
Or they dont even tell me and give me interviews for the test engineer position and I find out on the fly during the interview its not the position I applied for.
God help me. I am black listed as a test engineer

how to fix smol bren?

Entire flock of birds falls out of the sky in Mexico. How does /sci/ explain this?

Modern science and the culture surrounding it is just leftover remnants of enlightenment era political and philosophical propaganda. Newton is a religious figure for materialists that want to set a narrative and challenge church and state authority. This can be more clearly seen by Darwin and his followers: even when the theory is shown to be wrong, he was still right "in spirit". Ie in that he was against metaphysical thought. People have been claiming we were ancestors of animals for thousands of years, yet Darwinism and the controversy surrounding it is a very modern phenomenon. This is because the DNA of Science Culture is fundamentally reactionary: only when the zeitgeist moves away from philosophy and religion and towards strict materialism does the conversation become meaningful.

Pic related is an enlightenment era propaganda piece meant to cast newton as a god like being with divine knowledge spilling out to peons.

What do the products of inertia in the inertia tensor mean and what happens when they're 0? Would a rotation around such axis not work?

Wether viruses are "alive" or not is the most pointless discussion in bio-sciences. Literal semantics wank without any meaningful ramifications.

There is no external threat that could realistically wipe out humanity within the next couple million years