>Want to understand a topic >Formula is presented >Formula is written in Greek with vague equivalences you can't realistically apply due to a lack of units and measure words. >Can't copy-paste formula because it's an image >No breakdown of the calculation process or answer table to examine either, so you can't try to figure it out on your own
Why? Why do this? Is this some grand gatekeeping tactic? I hate seeing Greek in formulas.
>Bill has an apple tree but the apples are too high >Bill has a ladder x meters long and puts it at theta degrees against the tree >Find all the roots of this sixth degree polynomial to help bill get the apple
Why do they use such bizarre looking equations as an example of how to do things? It's very distracting for me. I don't know how those equations are derived or what any of it means.
>a car is moving y = x^4(x^2 + 2x + 3) >Describe wtf this car is doing
It feels like I have missed a trick. Once I learned how to use Excel everything they tried to teach me in Calc 1 became irrelevant.
How can an AI solve the Riemann hypothesis other then just iterating every theorem in ZFC? If human mind are just computers, how are they able to solve math through intuition?
Why doesn't gravity accelerate things in space? If I'm on a planet like Mars with little air density its low gravity can accelerate me to higher speeds on earth because there's not enough resistance to stop it like on earth. So why don't objects in space accelerate continually? You can use gravity assists to accelerate like pic related when you're in the sphere of influence of a planet but objects in space are always under a sphere of influence mainly the suns.
How is it that while being in orbit you maintain a constant velocity?
Seriously, this is relevant, some of the shit I have to learn at university is so far out there, that I have nothing in my mind where it would be even just remotely comparable too and therefore I have trouble memorizing it. Even if I do memorize some stuff for the exam, I have forgotten most of it three weeks later, which makes the whole thing feel like a superficial exercise. I thought i could just learn to approach the things more like I did when I was a kid but I just fucking can't, it's impossible, even if there's technically nothing to get confused by, I find it hard to overcome certain thinking patterns that I've always followed or certain assumptions on how to think about a something even though they were unfounded and wrong.
Daily reminder that atheist scientist after decades of experiments hasn't been able to make abiogenesis happen in a lab.
Is a made up explanation that is not real.
Every experiment to prove abiogenesis just proves DNA organic molecules just spawn with primitive DNA from the inorganic matter suddenly after a few days.
>be nasa >take "photo" of jupiter >few years go by >take another "photo" of jupiter, this time claiming to show the aurora borealis at its north pole >it's the same picture, pixel for pixel, just color enhanced with a photoshopped blue swirl on top of it, not a single cloud has moved even a pixel's worth of distance
yep. totally real.
