ITT: Scientifically proven facts that actual scientists can't publicly agree with without losing their job.

Let's get the elephant out of the room, embryos are persons, denying it only works because it helps you sleep at night, you are weak beyond belief if you think otherwise. If there can't be a line traced to where an individual aquires personhood then the most natural assumption is that personhood is aquired at conception.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rURMmLyqtOk

I think it boils down to self preservation, both in a social and biological aspect, that is, if a mother believes that the child was to be a burden on her then she must kill it. This is interesting as animals usually take out those who are born maimed or will bring harm to their other children but there are very few instances (if any) where a mother btfo their child if she herself isn't dying or believes the child threatens her health directly.
i'd like to hear your thoughts on this matter.

being indoctrinated doesn't make you a scientist

Predicting Solar Flares by Monitoring Seismic Activity and Related Deductions About the Source of Vulcanism and Seismic Activity on Earth


For the past several decades, the scientific community has repeated the same refrain with regards to explaining the high temperature of the core of the Earth: “Surely latent heat from the formation of the planet that has somehow persisted for the past 4 ½ billion years and it just hasn’t had enough time to cool off yet!” Does this not sound like a pathetically lazy cop-out to you? School textbooks will alternatively claim that scientists do not know why the core of the Earth is so incredibly hot.

It is now the 21st century and the time has long since come and gone to connect the dots between high core temperature, solar activity, vulcanism, and seismic activity. A flare rated X1.5 was recorded on the morning of July 3, 2021 and the SWPC’s “forecast” completely failed to predict it. The SWPC has never once successfully predicted the date of an X-class flare. However, independent enthusiasts such as Benjamin Davidson were able to successfully anticipate the July 3 event, and this author has a theory as to how he was able to do that. To understand how he did it, and how this author and likely others were able to do the same, we must first understand what it is that makes the core of the Earth so hot.

AIs and robots can focus on one task indefinitely, what is the evolutionary purpose of us not being able to do the same or even close?

Hi /sci/ it is my brother's birthday soon, he recently graduated from cambridge with a 1st class maths degree (so he's smarter than all you fuckers). Please suggest good non-reddit gift ideas. I'm thinking books but all thoughtful and original ideas welcome.

Why is genocidal anti-white propaganda being pushed in schools?

What do you think of the theory that only one person in a million has any real potential for greatness? Is it true? Do you believe that everyone is innately equal? That people are born with different levels of ability or motivation?

It's time for some integer partitions, /sci/

I will be posting the answer in one hour.
I want to see the different approaches people take.

>born too early to become biologically immortal