Fuck Archimedes

mean in gluon color charge

I'm gonna be honest, despite generally being pretty skeptical I thought this guy's ideas were really neat.
That being said I'm not trained in any of this and don't have the mental faculties to call bullshit on the science parts.
Any /sci/ bros have an opinion on his claims?

>Yeah dude, time went flying at the gym yesterday. Needless to say I wasn't able to study for this exam. You'll do your old buddy a favor and hand your solutions in as 'Chad Thundercock, Student Number: 13371488' I presume?

What do?

Science is simply organized retardation.

The scientific method
1) Strawman your opposition
2) Make up invalid experiments
3) Insist you debunked your opponents
4) Commit logical fallacies (especially that your inability (because you are retarded or strawmaning your opposition) to replicate a experiment proves it wrong)
5) Shout some famous science gods name like newton
6) Shout something about some laws
7) Shout:
>The science is settled !

Science was wrong about everything and never right; its time to grow up.

Best example:
The onions scientist face:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Utadwck9htM

Meanwhile in reality:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n9cdfUYkrLY

You need to make the sail parabolic not flat.

>NOOOOO that one video is fake !
Myth busters confirmed this ! Scientists can not even get the basic straight.

#replication_crisis

On a scale from 1 to 10 where 5 is exactly as difficult as the other captcha. I'll start.
>IQ 125-130
>4

+10^6s out of solid core seems too good to be true?
So how good would it be really?

why are we so alone?
all these stars yet nothing not a single life

For every action, there is an equal, but opposite, reaction. So, if I throw a ball, it will always bounce right back into my hand. There's something I'm missing. How would you calculate where a ball will go after it bounces on the ground using force vectors?

is it possible to create new emotions?