Who was in the right here?
Threads by latest replies - Page 3335
(5 replies)
(5 replies)
Why are there so many /pol/tards and s/x/hizos on /sci/ ?
(8 replies)
110 IQ is the sweet spot
(5 replies)
Is this correct?
>We ignore those cases because we are told he didn't, but it still affects the odds.
This sounds retarded.
Is this one of those frequentist vs. bayesian conundra?
>We ignore those cases because we are told he didn't, but it still affects the odds.
This sounds retarded.
Is this one of those frequentist vs. bayesian conundra?
(14 replies)
how much will rockets increase climate change?
(6 replies)
New temperature scale, plz halp
No.13418419 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Quoted By: >>13418437 >>13418451 >>13418691
One of the most common calculation mistakes I've noticed repeatedly in my many years in the scientific fields is that people start out with the natural assumption that the temperature of matter in it's zero energy state is 0ºK. That isn't true in this universe, at least not yet. In the universe we live in, the the temperature of matter in it's zero energy state is 2.7ºK. Its a small difference and doesn't seem like a big deal, but the mistake often compounds itself and ends up playing a part in larger inaccuracies.
In order to combat this recurring problem & to make calculations easier, I have decided to introduce a new temperature scale with a zero point at the temperature of the universe, but I'm not adamant about the specifics of the new scale beyond that. The units and the name of the scale seem arbitrary to me, I haven't come with anything to care about beyond the convenience of having a scale with it's zero point at the rest energy state of universe. I was thinking of naming the units "Universal Realvins" or just "Realvins", but also thought that since the unit is based on blackbody temperatures then maybe Boltzmann's name should be attached. Maybe the surface temperature of the sun could be set to 10000ºRealvin to complete the scale with a blackbody theme, or maybe 0ºK could be set to -1ºRealvin.
If anyone has any better ideas, please fill me in, otherwise I expect you all to fall in line and adopt my new temperature scale without fuss.
In order to combat this recurring problem & to make calculations easier, I have decided to introduce a new temperature scale with a zero point at the temperature of the universe, but I'm not adamant about the specifics of the new scale beyond that. The units and the name of the scale seem arbitrary to me, I haven't come with anything to care about beyond the convenience of having a scale with it's zero point at the rest energy state of universe. I was thinking of naming the units "Universal Realvins" or just "Realvins", but also thought that since the unit is based on blackbody temperatures then maybe Boltzmann's name should be attached. Maybe the surface temperature of the sun could be set to 10000ºRealvin to complete the scale with a blackbody theme, or maybe 0ºK could be set to -1ºRealvin.
If anyone has any better ideas, please fill me in, otherwise I expect you all to fall in line and adopt my new temperature scale without fuss.
(27 replies)
Calculator Thread. I'll start
(19 replies)
science showing the incredible similarity between masturbation addicts and opiate addicts https://www.prophecynewswatch.com/article.cfm?recent_news_id=1897
(13 replies)
black "person" here
I got into science to learn the truth
the harsh truth is that we are indeed low IQ
I got into science to learn the truth
the harsh truth is that we are indeed low IQ
(13 replies)
Post nice science gif or webp, pls :)
