Threads by latest replies - Page 3238
Anonymous
How many genders are there? what is sex (you know what I mean, no immature jokes)?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13439551 I would go with this definition
Male: Has testicles somewhere (you can check by DNA analysis)
Female: Has ovaries somewhere and possibly an uterus (you can check by DNA analysis)
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13439560 This, outside of anglospeak there isnt even word for it in most languages
Anonymous
>>13443040 Finally someone who fucking gets it.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13441117 This picture is (mostly) correct though. Those are deep-rooted cultural values of most of the western world. And they're pretty damn good values too.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13448598 gender isn't real, it lives entirely in your head. the gender bullshit isn't even a coherent narrative for trannies either since they insist that they are changing their sex, not their gender. gender people are the pure schizos who say things like "i'm non binary" as though that actually means anything.
Anonymous
Which vaccine did /sci/ get?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13417760 look
bascially
i won't take vaccine
hahahahahahaha
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
What's with the people in this thread equating that not wanting to take experimental vaccines = antivaxx?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
My appointment is next week a day before final exam. Should i get it?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Covid is fake and gay
Anonymous
Everyone loves to meme about genetically engineered catgirls/furries/kobolds for domestic ownership, but I haven't heard of any major advances in genetic engineering in the normie news.
Anonymous
Anonymous
>>13444328 ... also when they grow up.
Anonymous
>>13447899 Are the big tits for more hardware?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13447925 Probably. Batteries, perhaps?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13440797 Leave the skull shape as is, put cat ears on top, drag a nerve from the ears to the ear canal
Anonymous
Anons who are into tranny science (sexology), what are your views? Do you believe in Blanchard's typology or innate gender identity?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13444780 Blanchard's typology was pretty accurate for the cases he was dealing with in the 80s-90s. Now that being a tranny has gone viral, there are probably a few other types on top of those, especially in FtM which afaik didn't previously exist.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13444783 What a demented board.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13447158 Hi, fellow GAMP.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
how do the postmodernist retards that believe "gender" is constructed or constructed upon performance deal with the fact that even very simple animals that rely solely on instinct have what they call "gender" (i.e. characteristic differences in behavior based on sex)? what about the huge influence of neuroendocrinology on behavior?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13444780 >Boys have penises >Girls have vaginas There is your tranny science. A men dressed as a girl is not a girl. It's just a man dressed as a girl.
Anonymous
Is it possible for humans to give rise to a new species 500,000 years down the line? I feel like humans won't evolve into different beings like our ancestors did because we have a thing called society/civilization(that doesn't work on darwinism principles) which protects us from evolutionary pressures that our ancestors experienced. We will change and grow resistance towards different diseases/viruses but I don't think we'll change from homo sapiens to another animal. What does science have to say about our future?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13448608 This. Humans are the final chance for Earth life to break through the filter.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13446884 Eugenics is necessary because modern humans are simple not capable of solving the problems we will face. We must ascend to a more intelligent species.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13448652 So you're saying we need a eugenics program that selects for both high intelligence and wide hips. Sounds like a win/win.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13446884 >our evolution is now societal and technological I see, people can't stop watching a screen for more than 15 minutes taking everything seriously in the digital world.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13447916 >it's all about muh economy. Ya. It is. And if so many retards like you didn't take "economic growth" as necessary and basically a given (boomer says we have no choice, we simply aren't having kids wah wah wah bla bla bla), like some kind of delusional religious fanatic, it wouldn't work.
Anonymous
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=60z_hpEAtD8
Fuck cross product, geometric product is what we should've been learning from the beginning.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13431344 Any actual introductions with more examples and clear definitions on this subject?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13431344 Thanks, fascinating video.
Anonymous
>>13431344 I have been using this shit for 3d graphics for a few years, it makes life so much easier. I can even work out all sorts of transformations on paper by hand. No stupid matrices
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13445537 Have you like written a library for it?
Anonymous
Anonymous
If black holes are physical holes in three-dimensional space, then doesn't that prove that the universe has four spatial dimensions? Also, doesn't every hole have to have an end? If black holes exist, then shouldn't it logically follow that white holes exist, and that black holes are essentially wormholes?
Anonymous
>>13446975 No no no and no!
I think you absolutely don't understand what you're trying to understand and so you're thinking complete nonsense. How are you going to turn a black hole into a wormhole? Don't try to come up with your own hypotheses when you obviously haven't read anything on the subject.
Anonymous
>>13446975 Everything you write here is just hypothesis (except the wormhole thing, that's bullshit - a black hole has nothing to do with a wormhole), so it proves nothing.
Anonymous
>>13447691 >>13447703 Isn't a wormhole supposed to be a thing that connects a black hole to a white hole?
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13446975 why are zoomers so fucking stupid, bros?
Anonymous
math is the only logical subject, everything else is shit
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13444196 How could someone say something so controversial yet so brave?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13444210 Try to put a number in between and 1. I dare you.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13444196 >math is logical crickey m8
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13444368 > He hasn't read Principia Mathematica yet. Ngmi
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13444196 >Logical >Positive and negative numbers aren't even symmetric Retard
Anonymous
Anonymous
>>13446783 I mean, is that an excuse really? Mathematics has become so advanced that if all you do is jump around fields you're never going to do anything useful, just make a bunch of small nothing proofs. There was a point when going that was good, necessary even, that being Hilbert's time, but not in the past 70 years or so. It shows in Tao's work, he doesn't have a major theorem connected to his name.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13444651 still better than australia?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>everyone hating on tao
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13445561 I agree but I don't think he tries to tack his name on everything, most papers I see he's maybe coauthor with one other guy. He does seem to enjoy jumping around and solving problems rather than being specialized in one area, nothing wrong with that tho. Modern algebra is all a bunch of hyper abstract crap and analysis is all applied pdes, where he's at in combinatorics/number theory
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13447392 Green–Tao theorem is pretty significant imo
also knowing different areas is good for potentially solving new problems, for example connes embedding conjecture was solved through computational complexity
Anonymous
the concept of infinity is retarded
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13447012 >infinity is synonym for undefined number Fixed it for you retard.
Anonymous
>>13447012 Infinity is the only real number
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13447012 >the concept of infinity is retarded I'm not sure why I even continued to read past this point. Math doesn't necessarily have to reflect the practical reality you inhabit, you realize this right? There are provable uses of the concept. holy fucking shit.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13448288 No, that would be 1.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13447012 Infinity = 1
The "some infinity bigger than another" is just a visualization to compare quantities but if you want to get technical, infinity as a concept is just 1
