Is shape really just meaningless or are there energetic properties to it? Why does lighting strike at pointy objects? Why do forks spark in a microwave while spoons don't? Are we aware of all the energies and their properties? Surely, it would be naïve to say energy does not affect shapes with such a limited understanding of energies. Not to mention the black swan paradox. Well, a professor dabbled in the science of shapes and discovered astonishments that could possibly explain historical mysteries: Shape Power By Dan A:
https://archive.org/details/ShapePowerByDanA.DavidsonbOk.xyz

Any mechanical engineers here take mechanical/machine design? It's gotten to the point now where I feel overwhelmed not really "Getting it". The material our professor is giving us is dense, extremely dense. Usually not with alot of explanation of concepts as well. For any ME's here that took it, are there any good online resources that you know of? Thanks.

I'll be 24 when I start and 28 when I finish, so all of my 20's would be spent without money, or should I get a masters and go into that field and make money ? The upside of medicine in the uk is guaranteed stability and usually a 80k-120k salary in the UK.

ITT post equations that have not been solved for centuries

Given a set $A \subseteq \mathbb N$ the only way I know if it's infinite is by checking $n \in A$ for infinitely many different $n$ which is impossible. Similarly I cannot prove there exist any finite sets either since even if I've checked for $1,2,\ldots,n$ we could still have $(n+1) \in A$. Furthermore even if there were both finite sets and infinite sets, it would be impossible to figure out when two sets are equal without again checking infinitely many $n$ which is impossible.

Is there even a single person that can compete?

but

you must abandon SCIENCE and MATH, never ever allowed to study such subjects or research them

would you take it?

can i learn all of these topics in 12 days?

What are the limits of the frequency of light?

Years ago I read an article in a science magazine about a paper regarding anti-entropic matter. Entropy is one of the arrows of time which is arbitrary, meaning it can run in either direction, which means it was just as likely for our Universe to be entropic or anti-entropic. It was once believed that any anti-entropic matter would long since have been eliminated through interaction with entropic matter, but this article said the study used computer modelling to show anti-entropic matter would be much more resilient than was previously believed.

This got me to wondering if it's possible that there are possibly local areas of anti-entropic matter and, if so, what physical properties it would possess. For example, what would an anti-entropic star look like?

I've been asking this question for years, and no one has been able to even venture a guess. How would an anti-entropic star appear to us? Or an anti-entropic galaxy? Would it have a supermassive white hole at its centre?