What is the best book to learn Logic seriously?
Threads by latest replies - Page 287
(15 replies)
(5 replies)
whats the science behind the BBC (big black cock)?
(5 replies)
Guys I need help with my genetics test
I found the first answer by using the Hardy-Weinberg equation to find the frequency of the dominant and recessive alleles, then used it to find the probability that the unaffected parent is heterozygous. Since heteroxhomo makes 50/50 hetero/homo offspring, I divided it by 2 to get 0.0384.
The second and third questions have so many probabilities going on I have no clue what to do. pls help.
I found the first answer by using the Hardy-Weinberg equation to find the frequency of the dominant and recessive alleles, then used it to find the probability that the unaffected parent is heterozygous. Since heteroxhomo makes 50/50 hetero/homo offspring, I divided it by 2 to get 0.0384.
The second and third questions have so many probabilities going on I have no clue what to do. pls help.
(5 replies)
so yer saying that, such trivial, everyday activity that is now basically abundant in the visual, computer graphics scenes, that is also, well, just everyday business as everyday as calculating the trajectory of baseball throwing,
actually is undescribable, and undefinable by any sort of general mathemathics? that what you saying?
and dont say ik or robotics because thats either a single chain, or just complete neural AI nonsense without considering any physicality but action-reaction responses only
actually is undescribable, and undefinable by any sort of general mathemathics? that what you saying?
and dont say ik or robotics because thats either a single chain, or just complete neural AI nonsense without considering any physicality but action-reaction responses only
(8 replies)
so you all are telling me that despite 200 years past borelli's de motu de animalium, nobody still has enough balls and brains to expand that into animal locomotion as a study on how animals motor pattern actually work
yeah to be fair of what importance would that be back then.
yeah to be fair of what importance would that be back then.
(39 replies)
How does collapsing of the wave function correlate to any of the interpretations of quantum mechanics?
Isn't it that to measure a quantum object, we have to interact with it? Doesn't interacting with anything change how it works? How is it special in this case?
How does that relate to MWI or Copenhagen for example? What does any of this mean in the macro level?
I'm trying to understand the significance of this thing, and why there is still debate over it
Isn't it that to measure a quantum object, we have to interact with it? Doesn't interacting with anything change how it works? How is it special in this case?
How does that relate to MWI or Copenhagen for example? What does any of this mean in the macro level?
I'm trying to understand the significance of this thing, and why there is still debate over it
(7 replies)
Current Conception of IQ
No.14350809 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Quoted By: >>14350921 >>14351245 >>14351250 >>14352798
>Be me
>Tested 127 IQ (96th Percentile)
>Still an utter dumbass
There's gotta be some sort of flaw with intelligence JUST being measured by pattern recognition and memorization. If not, how fucked is society if AT LEAST 19 in 20 people are complete numbskulls?
>Tested 127 IQ (96th Percentile)
>Still an utter dumbass
There's gotta be some sort of flaw with intelligence JUST being measured by pattern recognition and memorization. If not, how fucked is society if AT LEAST 19 in 20 people are complete numbskulls?
(5 replies)
the retards who complain about "muh grandfather PARADOX", " muh causality PARADOX", etc. whenever a time travel movie's discussion comes up are the same retards who would be calling length contraction a paradox in the 1900s
(5 replies)
Everything was making sense until this damn wheel pulley system.
>https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Mathematical_Principles_of_Natural_Philosophy_(1729)/Axioms,_or_Laws_of_Motion#Cor2
>https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Mathematical_Principles_of_Natural_Philosophy_(1729)/Axioms,_or_Laws_of_Motion#Cor2
(21 replies)
Did he create a free energy device?
