overated cringe equations
No.13579834 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Quoted By: >>13582055 >>13582256 >>13582301
According to https://www.livescience.com/51399-eulers-identity.html
"Euler's identity is often cited as an example of deepmathematical beauty. The identity also links five fundamental mathematical constants. "
>The number 0.
Not a number. Could be considered a representation of infinity.
>The number 1.
A number but there are arguments it dosent have to be one.
>The number ? (? = 3.141...).
Pi is not a number. But could be thought as a representation of infinity.
>The number e (e = 2.718...)
Again, "e" is not a number. Could be a representation of infinity.
>The number i.
'i' is not a number. Could be seen as a representation of infinity.
All this equation is saying is that infinity to the power of infinity plus infinity equals infinity. Fuck this brainlet shit
"Euler's identity is often cited as an example of deepmathematical beauty. The identity also links five fundamental mathematical constants. "
>The number 0.
Not a number. Could be considered a representation of infinity.
>The number 1.
A number but there are arguments it dosent have to be one.
>The number ? (? = 3.141...).
Pi is not a number. But could be thought as a representation of infinity.
>The number e (e = 2.718...)
Again, "e" is not a number. Could be a representation of infinity.
>The number i.
'i' is not a number. Could be seen as a representation of infinity.
All this equation is saying is that infinity to the power of infinity plus infinity equals infinity. Fuck this brainlet shit