What happens if two universes collide?

instead of focusing on deep learning, why don't we experiment with shallow learning?

Basically is there a name for a psychological condition that i have.
basically i just keep texting a girl i love and im always staying in front of my phone waiting for her to answer and when i text i feel relieved and when she answers i feel even more relieved, im addicted for real it can go up to 100 texting a day but i already did more
what's the name for this dependancy ? also i often just re read my messages that i said and what she said before just because seeing our conversation is pleasant for me and relieving, im fucking addicted its not normal i can't stop myself from texting few hours and i know its going to fuck everything like it already did before with other women

Also which meds to take to treat this shit ? i don't care i just want to make this addiction stop

>ebt good
>Wic good
>Unemployment good

Theoretically speaking what would happen to a person if they had significant amounts of graphene oxide inside of their internal organs during a solar strom?

I'm on my second semester in my CS course and I simply can't find ANY motivation to study for my online classes. The computer shit is easy for me, since I already knew how to program before I even got to college. My problem is with the stuff involving maths. For whatever reason, I just can't bring myself to study all this stuff online. I simply lack the motivation and zone out very quickly whenever I manage to sit down and attempt to study. I'm just full of this bullshit, Anons. I just want things to go back to normal. Anyone shares this feeling?

What book or books would you recommend to someone who wants to (re)learn maths, starting from the very basic stuff like arithmetics, climbing step by step more advanced topics?

What it says on the label.
Why isn't cognitive enhancement science pursued more aggressively? Logically its the best way to produce exponential returns? Improving our intelligence would improve the quality of all research. I'm not saying that it's necessary, not yet. There is however a limit for how far we can advance our understanding using only our natural brains. A dog can be the world's smartest dog but it will never understand calculus. At some point our monkey brains will reach their limit. Doesn't matter if it's an IQ 80 human or an IQ 200 human - there will be things we can't understand.

So, thread about cognitive enhancement science. The shitty stockphoto implies nootropics but that subject is discussed all the time on /sci by brainlets that want a magic pill. I'm more interested in therapy, surgery, training, meditation, gene manipulation, electric stimulation etc etc..

celexa vs lexapro (citalopram vs escitalopram)
so what exactly does chirality do or not do?
if right handed R-citalopram has little to no effect on rats in tests, why does citalopram/celexa purportedly have antihistamine efffects unlike Lexapro?
and how do they know there isn't a chiral synergy in vitro?
when I read about chemistry I often get the impression they are just pure deductions and not based on facts at all

tl;dr: I am taking citalopram and it doesn't feel like the same as when I took escitalopram
I feel better

Been trying this problem since 5am, originally wrote one of the terms wrong and didn't notice for an hour wondering why I was getting fucked answers. I've now reduced the problem to the two circled equalities. I must be retarded as I can't seem to solve them. Anyone care to help a nibba?