Scientifically speaking, why do men have higher sperm counts during sexual intercourse than with masturbation?

If two people put their buttholes against each other, so they formed a seal, then farted equally as hard, would the resulting fart that escaped out the sides of their a uses be linearly, logarithmically, or exponentially louder?

I refuse to further the knowledge in any area of math or physics which has been repeatedly tainted by the participation of women, black men or those with homosexual tendencies.
Which fields of study have been left relatively untouched by such people? I know that algebra is particularly attractive for homosexuals, as is graph theory and some topics regarding cosmology. Analysis seems to be safe for the most part.

I know on this board there are a lot of IFLS types and PC authoritarians who support social media censorship and want to label people as "conspiracy theorists" if they have any criticisms whatsoever of COVID-19 related policies and public discourse, but can we now acknowledge that concerns about the origins of COVID are perfectly legitimate, and that the actual """anti-science""" partisan ideologues were the people trying to shut down any and all discussion of such topics under the pretext that any such concerns were just racist right wing, conspiracies?

I mean, the articles on SARS-CoV-2 gain of function research that took place in Wuhan are literally available on sites like pubmed and have been since the beginning of the pandemic, and many scientists, and government officials have expressed concerns about the origins of COVID, but social media sites, SJWs, and popular news publications (not academic journals) have refused to allow open discussion of the topic, and have consistently hurled ad hominems and strawman arguments at anyone expressing legitimate concerns about the origins of COVID-19 and the obvious attempt by the mainstream media to censor such discussion. Even the Lancet, one of the most scientific journals in the world has expressed similar concerns. Pic related.

Source: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)02019-5/fulltext

Please tell me about why should we consider statisticians as scientist.

Pool's Closed Due to Ayys Edition

prev: >>13729504

Let's motivate ourselves with the stories of the painfully non gifted who pushed through the difficulties and obstacles and succeeded. I mean average to low IQ brothers.

How well understood are the interior fluid dynamics of a planet like Jupiter?

There is supposedly an ocean of metallic hydrogen beneath tens of thousands of km of clouds, but this has never been observed. Would such an ocean have "waves", or resemble anything like oceans as we understand them on Earth?

/math/ how accurate do you think the numbers are in this mass media survey of public attitudes towards mass media?
https://news.gallup.com/poll/321116/americans-remain-distrustful-mass-media.aspx
https://news.gallup.com/file/poll/321128/200929MediaTrust.pdf

I keep hearing everywhere that scientific and technological progress is getting exponentially faster, yet things today are only marginally different than, saying 2010, ie: only a marginal improvement.
So the question is, is technological progress really starting to speed up even more, or have things more or less stagnated?