you know him. he could be abrasive (he certainly is), he could be a bastard (no, not really; only if you were wrong, and stupid and pretentious enough to proselytise), but you know he was fucking right and he knew his shit. and with all that rogue, scoundrel attitude, he could be an amazing, enlightening explainer.
so, why did he go off line? what do without a reference frame anymore?
boys, I just flunked the fuck out of my organic chemistry exam. How the fuck do you expect me to remember a million reactions in a couple weeks. Any chemists out there to give me tips on who how to study 'smart'?
Yes mathematics sufficiently good enough perfectly describes reality, but also reality itself perfectly lays out mathematics. The two statements are equivalent why can't people understand this? Something about qualia is just as fundamental as numbers after all without qualia there are no numbers. I just have the feeling that qualia is itself self evident and no amount of numbers could ever describe the experience of it.
In other words all of mathematics and physics can be described as perfected language. If you try to use language in order to describe to a blind person what sight is like he still would not be able to understand it. Similarly trying to describe what experience is like through the language of mathematics will always be impossible because qualia are just as fundamental as the math itself.
Can someone give me tips on cleaning up a 24Bit WAV file with a sampling rate of 96k?
- to cancel noise reduction
- eliminate reverb
- make voices and spoken language stand out (the conversation takes place in the stairwell)
Made a thread on /b/ and got some help. Want to see if you guys could provide me with more. These were the tips given: >Audacity is a free program that should have noise reduction plug-in that's half decent. Reverb is very hard to deal with, especially without the proper tools and to my knowledge there are no free de reverbs that exist, there's a little bit you can do with selective subtractive EQ to help but not with the amount of reverb you get from a stairwell >1st thing would be to cut frequencies. take a look at where vocal frequencies lie. i would do some extreme cuts. then, i would probably change the track to mono. then compression. i would use reaper to do all this as it is "free", and has all the tools you may need. >another thought: i would also take a section of the space where vocal is not present and analyze the frequency. more frequency cuts there as well.
I come from a violent etc. etc. family and while watching anime I started being able to translate anime and other Japanese movies. I also did an almost perfect score in the highschool entrance exam. I also learned reading by the age of 3. If I also make a publishment by 2025, then I will be a forgotten genius behind another something.
I'm from a third-world country, currently, I'm an undergraduate. As part of our requirements, we were required to submit a paper to a Scopus indexed journal or conference. How hard is it if I only have a few months left? Idc how meme-y the conference or journal is as long as it is Scopus indexed. I just wanna get that piece of paper.
Do any of you all get a little discouraged by learning some new mathematics which you find "unintiuitive" or which you don't think you could have figured out yourself with enough time and technique?
