>the great thing about science is that it's true whether or not you believe in it.
No, mang. It's true only when it's true.
Threads by latest replies - Page 1083
(5 replies)
(16 replies)
(22 replies)
Is there actually any evidence for amphetamines (especially pure amph and meth) being useful beyond just getting high? Do they increase work efficacy?
(13 replies)
Why can't you chuds just TRUST SCIENTISTS?!?
(178 replies)
What do you make of this crap?
https://www.newsweek.com/math-suffers-white-supremacy-according-bill-gates-funded-course-1571511
https://www.newsweek.com/math-suffers-white-supremacy-according-bill-gates-funded-course-1571511
(9 replies)
Why do eyes dilate?
(7 replies)
What's the current stance on eggs?
Actually, can anyone spoonfeed the current consensus on the basics of nutrition?
Actually, can anyone spoonfeed the current consensus on the basics of nutrition?
(19 replies)
Are certain racial/ethnic groups biologically predisposed to be more attractive than others?
No.14120601 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Quoted By: >>14120830 >>14121019 >>14121057
This video by qoves studio discusses how genetically diverse (mixed race) people are more likely to have symmetrical faces, healthier skin, better immune systems, and robust bodies than other groups.
https://youtu.be/EoKqbxhG8Tg
He used the example that Latin Americans who even though live in underdeveloped countries still produce a disproportionately high amount of models every year.
https://imgur.com/a/PuFCbtV ^ is a picture of the most genetically diverse places in the world. Would it be ok to assume that places highlighted on the picture have more attractive people in them? I’m not talking ethnic features or skin tone but general markers of attractiveness I mentioned earlier.
I know we don’t consider groups in the picture above to be “mixed-race” but American definitions of race are terribly constructed to begin with - we lump Persians and Japanese as both “asian”.
https://youtu.be/EoKqbxhG8Tg
He used the example that Latin Americans who even though live in underdeveloped countries still produce a disproportionately high amount of models every year.
https://imgur.com/a/PuFCbtV ^ is a picture of the most genetically diverse places in the world. Would it be ok to assume that places highlighted on the picture have more attractive people in them? I’m not talking ethnic features or skin tone but general markers of attractiveness I mentioned earlier.
I know we don’t consider groups in the picture above to be “mixed-race” but American definitions of race are terribly constructed to begin with - we lump Persians and Japanese as both “asian”.
(8 replies)
black lives matter no more
funny science stickman says so
funny science stickman says so
(5 replies)
I was watching a multivariable calc review video for my PDE class. I laughed my ass off when I saw pic related in the professors video.
