Threads by latest replies - Page 1026

(40 replies)

RIP Evolution 1859 - 2022

No.14134514 ViewReplyOriginalReport
The penultimate pillar in the scientific temple of evolution is about to fall and when it does, Darwin is next, thats that big target they've been aiming at for the whole campaign. Evolution pisses off the woke crowd way more than it ever did the church. All that stuff about racial evolutionary difference is a big problem for people who are insistent that everyone is equal.
With Huxley out of the way, Darwin will be canceled for racism before the end of this year.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2022/01/22/scientists-unite-stop-imperial-college-cancelling-biologist/
>Scientists unite in failed effort to stop Imperial College cancelling biologist Thomas Huxley
35 posts and 6 images omitted
(7 replies)
No.14139160 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Give it to me straight, /pol/. Are dumb people liberals, or are liberals dumb people?
2 posts omitted
(25 replies)

Why is SpaceX so much better at building rockets than entire governments?

No.14137738 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Eurotrash and vatniks seething and coping at the moment lol
20 posts and 2 images omitted
(5 replies)

Was vaccination inspired by mithridantism?

No.14139277 ViewReplyOriginalReport
I know they don't work the same way but I have the feeling that Edward Jenner or Louis Pasteur must have though of the idea behind mithridantism before creating vaccines.
(5 replies)
No.14139214 ViewReplyOriginalReport
The scientific community lost what little credibility it had left after they joined the C-19 vaccines, genderfluid and global warming frauds. Future generations rightfully will judge them as the cowards who helped to lead humanity into the new Dark Ages.
(310 replies)
No.14079323 ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
Why do some people think we'll never truly have designer babies? CRISPR is new and we can already choose eye color with high accuracy
305 posts and 45 images omitted
(5 replies)
No.14139168 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Why did she do it?
(5 replies)
No.14136883 ViewReplyOriginalReport
COVID case numbers include the results from rapid antigen tests now. Was this a mistake? I thought they give too many false positives/negatives and introduce too much potential for brainlet operational error. Especially the nasal-swab RATs -- there's no way more than 20% of people are doing those properly.
(5 replies)
No.14138826 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Any good non-pozzed youtube channels?
(19 replies)
No.14138513 ViewReplyOriginalReport
>this evolved on its own
14 posts and 3 images omitted