>>13493071Everyone who says they had it or tested positive for it are speaking strictly anecdotally
Every nurse, doctor, or medical worker who claims to have witness someone dying from this disease is also speaking strictly anecdotally.
All parties are being lead to proclaim such statements because the information they acquired about this disease and the authorities that direct them about this disease compel them to do so.
No one likes a dissenter in times of worry. When the depression, anxiety, and stress is turned up everyone tends to seeks emotional assurance rather than being skeptical.
If everything is COVID-19 than ip so facto nothing is COVID-19.
What’s the basis to standardize a disease that has vague symptoms that are similar to others diseases or untestable symptoms (how do you test for someone losing taste or smell without them telling you?)
Questions: what’s the consequences if another disease is misdiagnosed for COVID-19?
Why do someone hospital decide to throw everything but the kitchen sink at a patient when treating this disease?
If the motivation to establish protocols for diagnosing and treating this disease comes from the pressure of being in a pandemic then who’s to say the protocols are not biased for this disease.
And if much that prolongs the declaration of the pandemic is from on a lack of data then begs its own question of integrity at this point.
What are we actually basing this all on? Trust?!?
If you haven’t figured out the circular logic that keeps popping up wherever the science meets policy then you’re not looking at the problem at all.
