Threads by latest replies - Page 3099
Anonymous
If there was an island of stable isotopes beyond element 118, wouldn't trace amounts have been created in supernovas that we could then detect? How is their absence not considered strong evidence that they are not stable?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13495010 I LOVE BoBLOX! :V
Anonymous
if we genetically engineer humans to
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13486705 >4) increase average IQ by 10000 I don't think this would be enough for you.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13486705 rapid overpopulation because even wit an IQ over 9000 the sheep keep breeding
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13486705 Probably blizzard would release a good wow expansion
Anonymous
Quoted By:
This thread was moved to
>>>/r9k/64903325
Anonymous
I’m going to beat the market with /sci/entific methods.
Anonymous
everyone in this thread is ngmi. If you are serious about making money you should visit the folks on /biz/. Nearly every single poster is a multi-millionaire with a sweet engineering STEM job too. Everyone on /sci/ is just a loser
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13493874 >Psychology of retail traders is a bigger factor when it comes to intraday trading I'd argue. Except most intraday movements are from algos not retail. Retail psychology only applies on longer timeframes.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13493906 >join the pump and dump Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13493495 >I’m going to beat the market with /sci/entific methods you finna boutta get shrekt like a mfker with dem /sci/yntifik methods
just read my gayrab nigga taleb and short squeeze the markets a lil each week till ya grab dat niggaswan by the throat
Anonymous
I don't know how this board was before but now it is full to the brim of larping DKs who clog the board with their retarded conspiracies or baits.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13494787 >/sci/ has prestige dead, you need to be 18 to post here and your ego needs to be small enough to fit a 747. You don't have any prestige, you are a clown and everyone laughs at you
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13494780 >How could you say the Wehrmacht was the most ethnically diverse? Because it was.
>America had blacks! Ok so that's two.
Germany had ethnicities from every continent (including Africa since your American brain can only worship black people) and many volunteers from their "enemies":
>Many of the foreign volunteers fought under the banner of the swastika from areas outside Europe and wanted to stave off Soviet domination or be free from British imperialism.[4] >Along with the forces allied to the Nazis, the Russians comprised the "largest contingent of foreign auxiliary troops on the German side with upwards of 1 million men."[6] Many of the foreign volunteers fought in either the Waffen-SS or the Wehrmacht. Generally the non-Germanic troops were permitted into the Wehrmacht, whereas the Germanic volunteers were recruited into the service of the Waffen-SS as part of propaganda-driven "pan-Germanic army" of the future.[7] >The non-German troops thus comprised a wide range of ethnicities, ranging from the mainly Turkic peoples in the Ostlegionen to the Muslim Slavs in the 13th Waffen Mountain Division of the SS Handschar and the Indians of the Indische Legion (the Indian National Army fought against the British on the Japanese side). For the majority of volunteers from Muslim communities, their animosity against the Soviets stemmed from their anti-Russian feelings, religious impulses (their disdain for Soviet atheism for example), coupled by the negative experience of Stalin's policies on nationality, and by the corresponding disruption to their way of life.[6] Germany's war effort was a global effort against Marxist dictators. It is better seen as a continuation of the war against the Bolsheviks with Britain and later America tricked into joining the wrong side by Zionists in positions of high power.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13494787 >not one of your theories have any basis in facts I think folks like you saying stuff like this actually supports /pol/ nut jobs more than anything.
Not one theory has any basis in facts? Not anything at all? Literally zero? You can't just be like "I see what you are saying, but..." you have to act like "They have nothing! Nothing at all! Atoms are bigger than the merits of their ideas!"
THAT is nuts.
The points they do have, are now special sacred points that they alone own that their opposition goes insane of the face of. Super power facts that they alone wield is where places like /pol/ get their energy.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13494787 >>not one of your theories have any basis in facts so you can't technically lose an argument Sorry, but /pol/ mostly posts videos and statistics here. That's why you guys lose against them.
They are just telling us basic truths while you guys have these huge wall of text mental gymnastics trying to victim blame white women beaten up by black men in videos or whatever.
Maybe if you trannies coherently told us your point of view and brought some facts we would listen to your arguments, but you don't seem to have any and you seem even less interested in discussing it with us and just hurl insults instead. So I really don't understand the point of you coming here just to get us all angry.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13493085 For 5 fucking years "muh /pol/" has been the scapegoat you retards use to justify your push for increased moderation on ideological grounds. If you don't like it, don't engage with it. "Don't feed the trolls" is literally one of the oldest internet adages; the fact that you're somehow oblivious to this is evidence that you're either painfully new and/or astroturfing Redditors. No, I don't like /pol/, and yes I wish we could discuss /sci/ topics without having to bring up retarded conspiracies or politics, but their presence deters coordinated colonization attempts on slower boards. Just filter that shit and move on.
Anonymous
When do we evolve to start eating plastics?
Anonymous
>>13494746 when we start force-feeding the population plastic so that only the ones who can consume plastic survive
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13494803 Is that how Bacteria do it?
Imagine how much better earth would be if the poor could just eat plastic
Anonymous
>there is a STEM shortage they said
>study STEM or don't go to college they said
>STEM masterrace they said
>300k starting math they said
>30% of math majors who are working aren't even working a degree tier job
>of those with a degree job, ONLY 6% are relevant to undergrad mathematics
Look at computer science/eng too BTFO
source
https://www.newyorkfed.org/medialibrary/media/research/staff_reports/sr587.pdf
FELLOW STEMLORDS, YOU SHOULD BE ACTIVELY DISCOURAGING YOUTH FROM PURSUING STEM.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13488815 >all top businessmen and like 90% of millionaire business men have a STEM degree This isn’t true at all.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13485973 No one is deserving of funding their education, however nowadays in order to contribute something new to the field or be able to handle an R&D job you have to get to the frontier of the field and it’s a lot harder now than it has ever been. I’d say a Ph.D is a more meaningful degree than a bachelors or masters because it is a lot easier to get the knowledge of a bachelors/masters on your own.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13473084 If Mathematics is allowed I don't see why Art shouldn't.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
STEM degrees are still better than anything else.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13473068 Australia education logic:
Learn maths applied to become a maths teacher. They lack any teachers who have learned maths at, University level.
The outcome gets rejected to be a teacher. Typical Australia no wonder the education level is so shit in the country.
Anonymous
Currently relearning Prealgebra via Khan Academy after ignoring maths for about 8 years, and I'm feeling like a bit of a brainlet. Does it get any easier?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13492290 >No I am not natty. but you are a nutty nutcase
Anonymous
>>13492290 Didn't ask, didn't read.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13492290 Thanks for the advice, anon
Anonymous
OP again, I've currently completed over 80% of Khan's Prealgebra module, so that's something
Anonymous
Anonymous
As a BIPOC identifying as female I'm literally shaking thinking that the world might eventually be taken over by these racist white supremacist so called "Artificial Intelligence". How can we make AI less racist and more of an ally for our oppressed friends?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
lost my shit at the gorilla article
Anonymous
What is a good book on the geological history of Earth (preferably in prose, but not pop science) that discusses its formation and eons?
Anonymous
If time stops at light speed, how can photons move through space?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13494587 So that means that the first photons after the big bang are still "there"? Where do they travel if there is no space before them?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
alright, I overestimated your power, /sci/
Anonymous
>>13494577 The light reference frame isn't a physically viable reference frame. They are created and destroyed at the same point in time for them. May give insight into why a photon doesn't undergo spontaneous decay into matter-antimatter pair (in addition to the inability to converse energy and momentum)
Anonymous
>>13494577 Photons are static, is space itself that moves.
You have been destroyed OP, go away and never return.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13494670 i will take that
>>13494686 shut up, you sound like a huge faggot
