Threads by latest replies - Page 3086
Anonymous (7 replies)
Scientifically speaking, if we do not successfully eliminate the use of fossil fuels and switch to a better source of energy before we run out or it just being impossibly expensive to extract, are we just stuck on this planet? And will we go back to steampunk tech or even back to 1800s tech? Are we screwed?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13498783 >Hydrocarbon oil may be produced in an abiotic process under the Earth's crust. that's a bold claim. gonna need some sources on that, friendo
Anonymous
>>13498783 Off yourself dipshit. Look at the oil platforms out at sea drilling beneath the ocean floor at enormous expense and tell me again how all the old Texas oil wells will surely refill. God damn I can't believe how stupid you are. Go slam your fingers in a door until you cannot post again.
Anonymous
>>13498797 You think oil demand disappears for the 50 years they have to wait for each well to refill?
Wow.
Either way, the fact that oil is reproduced abiotically is something that people get killed over.
The false scarcity of oil contributes to how many nation's wealth?
It's true, but you'll never know for sure, without getting on someone's radar that's willing to kill you over it.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13498201 >steampunk tech or even back to 1800s tech? those are also fossil fuel based
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13498805 Stop making shit up.
Anonymous (33 replies)
Mathbros no
not like this
Physics is supposed to be OUR bitch...this can't be happening. THEY WOULDNT EXIST WITHOUT US. I dont understand...
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13495748 tits or gtfo dumb btich
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>Recent studies conclude that men on average have higher intelligence than women by 3-5 IQ points. is this what you want to jump for joy over?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13495496 Further proof mathematics is correlated with verbal intelligence. Women have higher verbal intelligence on average.
Anonymous
Anonymous (5 replies)
Alright so let's say the Covid vaccines work. Going by the science behind it and the results they do and work well as most mRNA vaccines do. However, I've noticed a strange pattern in the science. The covid spikes pass the blood brain barrier but the white blood cells which are used to adapt to it do not. Do the covid spikes get stuck in the brain? If so what are the potential side effects of having a bunch of covid spike proteins in the brain?
Anonymous
>>13498729 >In a new study, researchers found that the spike protein, often depicted as the red arms of the virus, can cross the blood-brain barrier in mice. The spike proteins alone can cause brain fog. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/12/201217154046.htm Anonymous
Quoted By:
>Ctrl-F "vacc" 1. I'm not taking the vaccine 2. I don't go outside 3. I don't care if NPCs die from the vaxx or the virus Simple as.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13498729 The spikes are sharp and make holes in your blood-brain barrier
Anonymous
>>13498747 >Banks said binding proteins like S1 usually by themselves cause damage as they detach from the virus and cause inflammation. Hmm hmm brain inflammation. Reminds me of the zombie virus known as 'rabies':
>Rabies is a viral disease that causes inflammation of the brain in humans and other mammals.[1] Early symptoms can include fever and tingling at the site of exposure.[1] These symptoms are followed by one or more of the following symptoms: nausea, vomiting, violent movements, uncontrolled excitement, fear of water, an inability to move parts of the body, confusion, and loss of consciousness. And for a conspiracy theory twist the CDC has 'preparation for zombies' as one of the main tabs on their website:
>https://www.cdc.gov/cpr/zombie/index.htm So what I'm thinking is that the main issue not being discussed with Covid and its respective vaccines would be brain inflammation which would cause rabies-like symptoms along with losing mental faculties.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13498758 Based genius chad
Anonymous (32 replies)
Why is this the case?
Anonymous
>>13498250 Except that there ARE people who do it. A good handful even ended up writing books about it. It's not that it's impossible, it's that when compared to a modern civilized life, living in the wilderness is really fucking difficult with a hell of a lot more risks.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13498289 I never implied it was impossible. Very few people do it so there’s little land, little resources, no community or family. If you do it you are automatically an outcast, which means you are deprived of a fundamental need.
I just think it’s funny when people pretend they’re a choice. We are each enslaved into civilization whether we like it or not, which is convenient for the blood suckers who benefit from civilization and quite inconvenient for average men who receive no compensation for maintaining civilization. A world where a male model gets compensated more than those who do the back breaking labor that allows them to exist at all… just lmao
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13498289 It was easy when we were raised to do it and we were all experts at survival. Now we are just useless blobs that browse 4chan
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13498148 Yes, but the other members of his tribe (society) may not like it.
Anonymous (7 replies)
I have to make my Bachelors Thesis in Chemical Engineering next year, it has to consist on the design of a chemical plant for the production of a certain element.
Does anyone have any interesting reactions that I can use? I also need kinetics data, in order to design the reactor
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13498160 I will look into it.
Thanks
Anonymous
.chemical eng>hasn't yet switched to economics instead Decide depending on the quality of kinetics data you find. Neutralization comes to mind
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13498635 >Decide depending on the quality of kinetics data you find. This, don't be a pleb, just do a good job with using a set of data you can manage.
It's a comedy show when chemical engineering ""seniors"" present their work for of assumptions that are completely unrealistic
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>why yes I obtained the kinetics data for the project from my own research how could you tell?
Anonymous (6 replies)
>just land your rocket in the sky and build your city there bro
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13498485 Venus isnt real
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13498485 Yes, gravity is a hoax.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13498490 humans can't even land on the moon, let alone mars and you're going to "terraform" venus
is this the heckin faustino spiritino?
Anonymous (5 replies)
We know that one year has 365 ¼ days (365 days, 5 hours, 48 minutes, and 46 seconds, to be precise, yadda yadda).
One day is the rotation period of the Earth.
But in actuality, wouldn't the Earth complete ONE LESS rotation per year, because one DAY would be accounted for by the revolution?
So the Earth rotates [364 TIMES] on its axis in one year, not 365(plus the extra time)
Consider the following scenario:
A planet with no rotation with respect to its star system would have 1 day = 1 year, because light would go around once hitting all parts of it.
If it rotated once, you would get either a tidally locked planet or 2 days = 1 year.
Continue in the latter direction to get 3 days = 1 year, and so on to get to 365 days = 1 year
So the planet rotated only 364 times with respect to its star system.
Is my assumption to take the star system as the reference point wrong? Does the star's own rotation mean that the whole systems and all orbits are also rotating?
Help me make sense of this, /sci/anons.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
OPanon here I guess the real question is what the fuck is the angular reference point for all rotations and revolutions in the solar system? A stationary Sun? The milky way? Do we take the Sun's rotation into account? Do the orbit shapes themselves rotate around the Sun in that frame of reference?
Anonymous
Sidereal days vs synodic days
Anonymous
>>13498686 Thanks anon, that's what I was looking for
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13498687 You're welcome.
Anonymous (20 replies)
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13495764 how is bacon going to work as a kidney, wtf?
I don't understand
Anonymous
>>13495764 Sure, if there are no human ones available and I need it. I'm not a sandnigger.
Anonymous
>>13498655 need it for what?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13498671 For whatever reason OP presumes I need it.
See
>>13495764 >If u needed it Anonymous
Quoted By:
Yeah kidneys are nice, very watery so you can put them in with a bunch of other stuff and boil them. I don't know if the porky taste would be an issue though, I've had pig liver and I would much rather prefer the livers of other farm animals to a pig's. Kidney is less strong than liver though.
Anonymous (6 replies)
Hey /sci/, I'm doing well at Computer Science in uni, and I want to become a software engineer. I have a choice of one minor, so should I take on physics or math? Which minor will help my career prospects more, aside from learning a ton of programming languages?
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13497799 If you want to lean into stats/ML work or something data oriented in the future, take math. If you want to be doing simulation or graphics work etc. then take physics
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13497799 Math. Physics is bullshit.
Anonymous
>>13497799 Take math.There is no other degree as worthless as physics.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13498613 Except for mechanical engineering probably.
Anonymous (5 replies)
I graduated from uni with, Honours in Engineering (Processing and Materials).
I have yet to pass a single test for numerical reasoning despite having practiced for more than a few months now....
Have you ever aced these tests?