I still haven't gotten over the fact that all of us are really sitting on a giant rock in the middle of nowhere that is circling around a supermassive nuclear explosion.
Threads by latest replies - Page 3033
If you wanna get anywhere in this industry, my sweetest effervescent primrose, you've gotta stick this test tube where the sun doth not shine its sublime rays upon thee
Bros some old friends from college shared this video with me on faceberg about the Vaccines and I need some kind of response. What do?
https://streamable.com/v7wnxr
pic not related
https://streamable.com/v7wnxr
pic not related
ITT Talk about Robots
How do I escape the paradox of self reference?
I can't explain anything. I question what does that mean and it all goes poof
I ask does that make any sense poof
how you escape.
I tell myself a story to keep me asleep then in the morning I ask what does that mean. (end)
I keep telling the others they need a better reference frame. That there is something miss. That the edges are fake. Hopefully I won't have to make the same mistake.
I can't explain anything. I question what does that mean and it all goes poof
I ask does that make any sense poof
how you escape.
I tell myself a story to keep me asleep then in the morning I ask what does that mean. (end)
I keep telling the others they need a better reference frame. That there is something miss. That the edges are fake. Hopefully I won't have to make the same mistake.
Everyone, except retards and schizos, realizes that
"axioms", "logic" and "deduction" drive maths towards a
dead end. Mathematicians pull meaningless axioms out of
their asses and demand that we ordinary people fall to
our knees with tears of happiness spraying out the eyes.
Example: "x + 0 = x holds for every real number x"
is supposedly an "axiom". Obviously it is meaningless,
since, how can you even know that? Did they check every
real number x, and do you realize how many there are?
Where is the article in Scientific American that says
that this has been checked for all reals?
Some /sci-bro needs to file application for a grant
with aim to actually check all real numbers. Get time on
one of the supercomputers at MIT if you must. Obviously
the mathematicians would hate it. If we discover a real
number x different from x+0, their whole flimsy web of
nonsense crumbles like a proverbial Florida condominium.
This is what Norman is really saying. He has hundreds of
videos on youtube saying it, and do not forget, there
is safety in numbers, he must be right.
Mathematicians may not even be the worst.
Physicists claim "every electron is a lepton".
How can they know that? There is a helluva lot of
electrons in the universe, did they check each one?
Get out your microscopes bros. Once we find a bosonic
electron, we can kiss goodbye to the nonsense which
is modern physics.
Or biology. "Every ant is a hymenoptera". Bollocks.
Did they send inspectors out to check each ant in your
kitchen using ant-sizes gynecological instruments, anon?
I thought not. There is a huge number of ants on the
earth, and it is impossible to make sure for every one
how it is still put together down there. Especially
since you get ant juice in the eyes and it stings.
I tried.
And the list goes on. The state of modern science
is disastrous. We need to work together to rescue as
much as we can from this sad pile of rubble.
"axioms", "logic" and "deduction" drive maths towards a
dead end. Mathematicians pull meaningless axioms out of
their asses and demand that we ordinary people fall to
our knees with tears of happiness spraying out the eyes.
Example: "x + 0 = x holds for every real number x"
is supposedly an "axiom". Obviously it is meaningless,
since, how can you even know that? Did they check every
real number x, and do you realize how many there are?
Where is the article in Scientific American that says
that this has been checked for all reals?
Some /sci-bro needs to file application for a grant
with aim to actually check all real numbers. Get time on
one of the supercomputers at MIT if you must. Obviously
the mathematicians would hate it. If we discover a real
number x different from x+0, their whole flimsy web of
nonsense crumbles like a proverbial Florida condominium.
This is what Norman is really saying. He has hundreds of
videos on youtube saying it, and do not forget, there
is safety in numbers, he must be right.
Mathematicians may not even be the worst.
Physicists claim "every electron is a lepton".
How can they know that? There is a helluva lot of
electrons in the universe, did they check each one?
Get out your microscopes bros. Once we find a bosonic
electron, we can kiss goodbye to the nonsense which
is modern physics.
Or biology. "Every ant is a hymenoptera". Bollocks.
Did they send inspectors out to check each ant in your
kitchen using ant-sizes gynecological instruments, anon?
I thought not. There is a huge number of ants on the
earth, and it is impossible to make sure for every one
how it is still put together down there. Especially
since you get ant juice in the eyes and it stings.
I tried.
And the list goes on. The state of modern science
is disastrous. We need to work together to rescue as
much as we can from this sad pile of rubble.
>An ordinal number is a transitive set of ordinal numbers.
I have a function in mind, but don't know notation. If you like .999... = 1 BS, this is your thing too.
There exists a function G where each real number x ending in an even digit has a value of 1, and each real number ending in an odd digit has a value of -1.
Pic unrelated.
There exists a function G where each real number x ending in an even digit has a value of 1, and each real number ending in an odd digit has a value of -1.
Pic unrelated.
Do people who are 3/4 white generally just look white? Girl in the pic is 1/4 Filipina and just looks white to me. I can't find many more examples
If I weigh more than my the volume of water displaced by my surfboard, why don't I sink when I'm laying on top of it in still water?
Surfboard volume is approx 77,000 cm^3, so it displaces about 77kg of water if fully submerged. I weigh north of 100kg. This doesn't make sense.
Surfboard volume is approx 77,000 cm^3, so it displaces about 77kg of water if fully submerged. I weigh north of 100kg. This doesn't make sense.