Threads by latest replies - Page 2993

(31 replies)
No.13529627 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Do you do your part and bully people into taking the experimental vaccine?
26 posts and 3 images omitted
(33 replies)
No.13521316 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Einstein is a fraud
He was a patent clerk who stole many Aryan technologies and larped as his own
Light is not a particle, it's just a wave
Relativity is wrong
Quantum mechanics is kabalah for goys
Issac Newton was a sorcerer, he invented nothing, his one significant work is proving "G"ravity and the "G"lobe using "G"eometry for the Vatican
Leibniz the Christian invented calculus
28 posts and 3 images omitted
(19 replies)
No.13527512 ViewReplyOriginalReport
its two weeks before uni starts. When would you start studying for your courses, one week before uni? a day before?
14 posts and 4 images omitted
(5 replies)
No.13529525 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Is this the most soi problem in mathematics?
(7 replies)
No.13528112 ViewReplyOriginalReport
It has to be asked. Would buck breaking work? I would have thought it would result in unpredictable behaviors. What exactly happens psychologically to someone when you know you can't get away and you are being kept alive but tortured to break you down?
2 posts omitted
(6 replies)

Congrats on this

No.13529536 ViewReplyOriginalReport
seriously
1 post and 1 image omitted
(9 replies)
No.13529925 ViewReplyOriginalReport
BIOLOGISTS, ANSWER ME!
Which came first?
4 posts omitted
(25 replies)
No.13529082 ViewReplyOriginalReport
How are kids so smart today? How am I supposed to compete for science and math jobs when there are kids like pic related applying for the same ones? I've never invented anything.
20 posts and 1 image omitted
(13 replies)

“Settled” Science

No.13529952 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Sorry not sorry but if you are going to get into this science thing you are going to have to constantly defend your thesis ad naseum. Yes, that includes defending it against schizo’s and laymen. If a bunch of ignorant riff raff make you clutch your pearls then you either don’t have enough evidence or you straight up don’t understand. Having contrarians for the sake of contrarianism is part of the process, even in real deal scientific communities, having devils advocates is a vital part of the process because if someone wants to support a narrative then all they have to do is torture the data until it says whatever they want it to say. I’ve literally done this myself when creating white papers at my company because I wanted funding for this and that project and I know other people do it too because we catch each other doing it.

Nothing should trigger your scrutiny detector more than when someone says “the data shows”.

Pic unrelated
8 posts and 3 images omitted
(5 replies)