Threads by latest replies - Page 2971

(41 replies)
No.13536658 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Why is the CDC saying "experts say" and giving medical advice with no studies or data to back it up? Why are they trying to discourage people from talking to their doctor about it first? Isn't this absurdly unprofessional and borderline criminal?
36 posts and 4 images omitted
(11 replies)

Severity of Paraphilia - Voyeurism

No.13531856 ViewReplyOriginalReport
I'm investigating various paraphilias and I'm trying to classify the levels of severity of voyeurism from 1 to 10. I'd be particularly interested to hear from someone who has this fetish and how their paraphilia progressed. What I'm looking for specifically is to fill out a list from 1 to 10 with voyeuristic acts based on severity/public perception.
eg.
1. Watching someone.
2. Following someone without their knowledge.
3. Imagining someone naked.
4. Watching someone doing something private.
5. Watching someone take off their clothes.
6. Using a device to record someone naked.
7. Watching someone doing a personal sexual act (eg. masturbation, etc.)
8. Watching someone being involved in a shared sexual act.
9. Recording a personal sexual act.
10. Recording a shared sexual act.

This is just an example I came up with using my own personal research. If you have an alternative hypothesis or list, or want to move them around, please feel free. Also is there something before 1? Is there something more mundane than watching someone which is considered voyeuristic? Also, is there something more than 10? Is there an act I haven't listed which is the most severe act a voyeur could commit.

This is the beginning of a behavioural study on non-physical paraphilias. I'm currently looking at Exhibitionism and Voyeurism, but if you know any others or have one yourself, please feel free to post.
6 posts and 4 images omitted
(5 replies)
(12 replies)
No.13537124 ViewReplyOriginalReport
How did Sweden and Belarus have less covid deaths than the UK when they didn't do a lockdown?
7 posts omitted
(19 replies)
No.13536785 ViewReplyOriginalReport
is this scientifically accurate?
14 posts and 2 images omitted
(9 replies)
No.13535933 ViewReplyOriginalReport
where does wind come from?
4 posts omitted
(5 replies)

Stop saying "vaccinated" and "unvaccinated"

No.13537088 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Stop saying "vaccinated" and "unvaccinated". These injections are NOT vaccines. They are gene-modifying proteins that change how your body responds to SARS-CoV2, and changes how SARS-CoV2 mutates in your body.

Instead of calling someone "vaccinated", call them "GMO'd". Just like in food, there's genetically-modified food, and there's non-GMO. GMO-people need to isolate, whereas non-GMO people are the naturally occuring people for planet earth.

Start the conversation with your GMO'd friend by asking her if she eats non-GMO food, or GMO'd food. Then ask if she's GMO'd or non-GMO
(18 replies)
No.13536156 ViewReplyOriginalReport
r8
13 posts and 1 image omitted
(5 replies)
No.13537058 ViewReplyOriginalReport
>trust the doctors, they know what they're doing
(11 replies)
No.13534189 ViewReplyOriginalReport
I want to have the knowledge a good undergraduate computer scientist would. What do I need ?
6 posts and 1 image omitted