What will the Apple of biotech be like?
Threads by latest replies - Page 2968
Should I go with STEM or a humanities degree? I find Engineering stuff interesting enough and I'm good at math, but my real passion is I feel in philosophical and political matters.
>Clocks the recent News on RT
>Scientists are talking about Blackhole Megastructures
GET THE FUCK IN HERE!?!?!
>Scientists are talking about Blackhole Megastructures
GET THE FUCK IN HERE!?!?!
I know the brain is beset with biases and blindspots of all kinds. But how profound is our mental resistance to information that contradicts our ingrained ideas?
Is there an information kill-switch in the brain that causes us to disconnect from ppl/media that are trying - even with facts and logic etc - to tell us something we (really) don't want to hear?
What evidence for these kill-switch(s) is there?
Is this guy correct, or a schizo?
https://streamable.com/skaqju
Is there an information kill-switch in the brain that causes us to disconnect from ppl/media that are trying - even with facts and logic etc - to tell us something we (really) don't want to hear?
What evidence for these kill-switch(s) is there?
Is this guy correct, or a schizo?
https://streamable.com/skaqju
Is there nothing after death?
what causes some women to have big butts?
OK so when is this going to happen? We need scalable embryo selection to be developed as soon as fucking possible so we can make the average IQ of humanity ~115 (compared to todays 100). Pretty much the only development we need is deriving gametes from stemcells, which has already been done in mice, so I don't see why it's so difficult to do in humans.. Do you think the technology is purposely being hidden from us because of ethical concerns?
https://www.statnews.com/2019/06/05/creating-eggs-sperm-stem-cells/
https://www.statnews.com/2019/06/05/creating-eggs-sperm-stem-cells/
Further Elucidation of Organic Bose-Einstein Condensate Theory, Potential Explanation for Temporal Dislocation of OBECs Over Time
Back in June, I hypothesized the communication between two human subjects via neural OBEC linkage was a likely mechanism (one of two known mechanisms) for the transference of information from the future into the past. However, the exact structure of the OBECs and the mechanism through which they become temporally disjointed in the first place eluded me.
Passage through time is dependent upon mass. Objects with positive mass move forward in time, but objects with negative mass move backward. While we have established that mass can be inverted temporarily in the case of things like neutrinos, for Einstein-Rosen bridges to exist, entanglement between two atoms must be created, and for temporally disjointed bridges to exist, they must be disjointed. I considered the possibility that the entanglement could happen from a temporally remote point i.e. due to the emission of tachyons from the future toward the past, but have since dismissed this as highly implausible, given that tachyonic information is always precisely inverted in terms of its sequence of transmission.
Therefore, I pursued the hypothesis that entanglement must have its origins only at points where molecules are in perfect synchronization temporally and that this temporal separation must accumulate slowly over time, subsequent to the initial entanglement. The question then becomes, how does molecule B (the molecule in the "future") come to travel forward in time at a higher rate of speed than molecule A?
Back in June, I hypothesized the communication between two human subjects via neural OBEC linkage was a likely mechanism (one of two known mechanisms) for the transference of information from the future into the past. However, the exact structure of the OBECs and the mechanism through which they become temporally disjointed in the first place eluded me.
Passage through time is dependent upon mass. Objects with positive mass move forward in time, but objects with negative mass move backward. While we have established that mass can be inverted temporarily in the case of things like neutrinos, for Einstein-Rosen bridges to exist, entanglement between two atoms must be created, and for temporally disjointed bridges to exist, they must be disjointed. I considered the possibility that the entanglement could happen from a temporally remote point i.e. due to the emission of tachyons from the future toward the past, but have since dismissed this as highly implausible, given that tachyonic information is always precisely inverted in terms of its sequence of transmission.
Therefore, I pursued the hypothesis that entanglement must have its origins only at points where molecules are in perfect synchronization temporally and that this temporal separation must accumulate slowly over time, subsequent to the initial entanglement. The question then becomes, how does molecule B (the molecule in the "future") come to travel forward in time at a higher rate of speed than molecule A?
Is there any scientific proof that sex between an adult and a minor is traumatic?
Obviously not including rape.
>INB4 they can't consent
Obviously not including rape.
>INB4 they can't consent
What does /sci/ think about the concept of ocean pasture restoration? Essentially
>Target iron deficient ocean environments
>Seed them with iron
>Algae blooms
>Primary production explosion that starts an ecological chain reaction from phytoplankton and zooplankton all the way up
This is a carbon sequestration opportunity and I think it could assist in deacidifying the ocean via CO2 uptake.
https://theecologist.org/2018/may/03/can-we-remove-trillion-tons-carbon-atmosphere
>Target iron deficient ocean environments
>Seed them with iron
>Algae blooms
>Primary production explosion that starts an ecological chain reaction from phytoplankton and zooplankton all the way up
This is a carbon sequestration opportunity and I think it could assist in deacidifying the ocean via CO2 uptake.
https://theecologist.org/2018/may/03/can-we-remove-trillion-tons-carbon-atmosphere