Threads by latest replies - Page 2962

(29 replies)
No.13536578 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Who could've guessed that Archimedes's legacy would just be one big screw up?
24 posts and 4 images omitted
(48 replies)

Redpills

No.13528124 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Redpill me on whatever topic you want, math or science related of course.

"A jack of all trades is a master of none, but oftentimes better than a master of one."
43 posts and 8 images omitted
(9 replies)

Well /sci/?

No.13533311 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Please don't tell me you don't know how to do this.
4 posts and 1 image omitted
(8 replies)
No.13538739 ViewReplyOriginalReport
>Signaling virtuous victimhood as indicators of Dark Triad personalities.
https://psycnet.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037%2Fpspp0000329
3 posts omitted
(6 replies)

DUAL N BACK

No.13538229 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory exercise with DUAL n-back, not single.
https://dualn-back.com/
1 post omitted
(24 replies)

mathematical proof for rebirth

No.13538334 ViewReplyOriginalReport
i think there's a mathematical proof for rebirth like there is for intelligent life in the universe (drake equation). i don't know how to express it mathematically, but its premise is as follows.

there are essentially three numbers/sets that can meaningfully quantify events: zero (it never happens), infinity (it's always happening and will always happen), and every number OTHER than zero and infinity (it happens but can't be said to be infinite). taking this view it becomes apparent that the true spiritual conundrum has nothing to do with death, but with birth, and we can see that this same conundrum is answered quite simply and mathematically: it's not zero.

it's not zero. we know it's not zero. here i am typing to you telling you how it's not zero. and so immediately the pessimism boils up to say, "well that's no proof of what happens after DEATH! for all we CAN know you live only ONCE!"
and while this is phenomenologically accurate, it is actually mathematical an unreasonable assumption. because all we know is that it is not zero. and so the real question is, "what are the CHANCES, of all the numbers between zero and infinity that an event can happen, that that number is 1?"
imagine rolling a die with all the numbers between zero and infinity. what are the chances it lands on 1?
and remember, even if it takes an eternity it means nothing. they say 14 billion years passed before your birth, and that's just the time we can measure. what was your experience of it? so too will the ETERNITY of possibly universal cycles after your death be experienced: chances are you're just gonna wake up.
19 posts omitted
(5 replies)
No.13540019 ViewReplyOriginalReport
>eat the fluoride, goy
what is wrong with dentists?!
(6 replies)
No.13536331 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Why does stainless steel cool so fast even though it has a low heat conductivity?
1 post and 1 image omitted
(5 replies)
No.13539968 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Can someone help me with my digital signal processing class?

I have a signal x[t] = sin(100t) + sin(2000t) + sin(6000t)

I want to only pass sin(2000t).

I'm guessing I have to use a butterworth filter and have the two cut off frequencies be 100 and 6000 right?

what should my sampling frequency be?
(16 replies)

Let's rank the vaccines from most dangerous to least dangerous.

No.13539245 ViewReplyOriginalReport
11 posts and 2 images omitted