Threads by latest replies - Page 2689

(14 replies)
No.13626460 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Would it be possible to build large greenhouses in antarctica to feed the permanent bases in the continent? Any arctic anons have any experience with greenhouses during the summer when there's 24 hours of daylight?
9 posts and 1 image omitted
(64 replies)

So this scientist skipped getting a master's?

No.13625265 ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
I didn't know you could enroll for a PhD as an undergrad
59 posts and 10 images omitted
(25 replies)
No.13626147 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Is that right? There shoudnt be a lot more radioactivity since the water have contact with the core?
20 posts and 6 images omitted
(6 replies)
No.13626943 ViewReplyOriginalReport
What does /sci/ think about psychology? Can the replication crisis be solved?
1 post omitted
(20 replies)
No.13626785 ViewReplyOriginalReport
statistical humor thread

math and science jokes not related to statistics belong elsewhere, post them in a different thread
15 posts and 2 images omitted
(25 replies)
No.13625358 ViewReplyOriginalReport
What is the best introductary book on GR for a mathematician? I heard that Schutz is good, and Carroll is supposedly good to.
20 posts and 1 image omitted
(12 replies)
No.13624849 ViewReplyOriginalReport
This is Jennifer Zemblini. A ghost like entity from EurAsia.

If you genuinely try to believe in her, that she is real, a demon will spawn nearby and try to prevent you from believing in her or convincing others to believe in her.
7 posts and 1 image omitted
(5 replies)

Time travel thread

No.13627967 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Let's invent time travel.

Star Trek taught me adding only one more dimension is needed to turn time into a 2D flat surface you can move on using a wormhole.
(37 replies)

why 1 cup equals 16 tablespoons?

No.13625975 ViewReplyOriginalReport
it evidently does not, are Americans retarded? seriously try it for yourself, try to fill one cup with 16 tablespoons of water
32 posts and 4 images omitted
(19 replies)

Will we be as primitive to year 3000 sci as 1100 AD was to 2000?

No.13627548 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Considering we’ll be dead by 2100. I’m thinkin YEA we’ve got A LOT wrong scientifically that will be painfully obvious in the future.
14 posts and 1 image omitted