Threads by latest replies - Page 2684

(5 replies)

science in the quran

No.13630149 ViewReplyOriginalReport
*NOT A SCIENCE VS. RELIGION THREAD*

is it true that there are verses in the Koran that point very closely to things found in modern science?

for example: Were they created from nothing or did they create themselves? (Qur??n 52:35) addresses the dilemma that scientists face with the Big Bang and "starting from nothing"
(5 replies)
No.13630199 ViewReplyOriginalReport
How did insects come about? Did they come from the same landfish thing we came from or something else? Also are there even water insects? I've never heard of them.
(13 replies)
No.13627163 ViewReplyOriginalReport
I've decided to bite the bullet and make a twatter and instagram. What are some /sci/-related people to follow? Pic semi related
8 posts and 1 image omitted
(5 replies)

Stats question

No.13630191 ViewReplyOriginalReport
My mother had her IQ measured to be 140…in a south asian country in the late 80s…..
What would her IQ be if normalised to a first world nation?
(5 replies)

Lucid dreaming

No.13630179 ViewReplyOriginalReport
What does /sci/ think about lucid dreaming and science related to dreams in general? Why does no one care to research this?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F8zusj3D10o
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lucid_dream
(51 replies)

Grow, grow, grow

No.13623660 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Based on the power of the mind (placebo/nocebo), do you think taking MK-677 (which does promote growth) at an age where one might still have their growth plates open work despite them actually being closed?

I'm fine with my height but a few extra cm would be great.
46 posts and 2 images omitted
(7 replies)

Why is this solution wrong?

No.13629422 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Hey /sci/, I don’t have an education physics, but I heard about the one way speed of light problem, and I tried to solve it. I sent my attempt to a physics professor, and he gave me this explanation for why it was wrong, which I am too dumb to understand. He also linked two papers which I had more difficulty understanding.
Could someone explain more clearly why I am wrong? Thanks.

>The “one-way speed of light” problem has been around for a while (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One-way_speed_of_light, or https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pTn6Ewhb27k), and it’s true that to date there has been no substantiated experimental measurement of the one-way speed (though there have been many other tests of one-way dispersion, equivalences of synchronization conventions, etc.)

>The primary problem with your proposal is the same problem in the “circular twin paradox” (I’ve attached a couple versions for explanation). Even if one of the twins is at the center of the circle, we cannot immediately apply any of the rules of special relativity (even using anisotropic light speed) because the orbiting observer is not in an inertial frame (they are centripetally accelerating). Thus (as your first footnote mentions) we need to either use general relativity to handle the acceleration or we need to be extremely careful about each infinitesimal transformation of frames as B goes around A (made all the harder since we’re assuming light speed is anisotropic, but doable [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One-way_speed_of_light#Generalizations_of_Lorentz_transformations_with_anisotropic_one-way_speeds]).

>The end result will be that B’s clock will have varying time dilations around the circle, so it won’t measure 10 minutes for each quarter with respect to A. In order to aim the pulses to be properly intercepted by B, A will have to account for these time differences anyway, which will still require the synchronization of their clocks using the two-way speed!
2 posts omitted
(11 replies)
No.13624613 ViewReplyOriginalReport
What is evolutionary advantage killer whales has by having matriarchal group structure?
6 posts and 1 image omitted
(15 replies)

Is it possible to unlearn a language?

No.13628694 ViewReplyOriginalReport
I don't want to know english anymore
10 posts omitted
(13 replies)

Cryobros...

No.13627747 ViewReplyOriginalReport
>Frozen bodies and brains of wealthy Brits and Americans are SNATCHED from Russian lab where they were stored in the hope of being brought back to life: Cryogenics firm owners' bitter divorce leads to raid
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9978003/Cryogenically-frozen-bodies-brains-rich-people-SNATCHED-Russian-lab.html
8 posts omitted