/sci/ - Science & Math

54KiB, 833x307, very_intelligent_man.png

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Fri 17 Sep 21:33:22 2021 No.13653703 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>13653769 >>13654229 >>13654254

Ok which one of you is this

1 post omitted

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 17 Sep 2021 21:46:26 No.13653769 Report

Quoted By:

>>13653703
Too bad Terry isn't around to mentor this person. Seems like a good match.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 17 Sep 2021 22:52:43 No.13653953 Report

Quoted By:

Jesus, the cringe

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 18 Sep 2021 00:52:38 No.13654229 Report

Quoted By: >>13654251

>>13653703
kekkeroni.
What site is this? Is there more where this comes from? This is a thing of beauty whom made me IRL smirk.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 18 Sep 2021 01:12:12 No.13654251 Report

Quoted By:

>>13654229
It was a posting on Varsity Tutors. This guy is an adult so he wrote this himself.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 18 Sep 2021 01:16:07 No.13654254 Report

Quoted By:

>>13653703
so this fag wants to talk about everything lawl

379KiB, 1920x1080, Screenshot (245).png

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Medschool fags and doctors, can you tell me why FDA voted against boosters?

Anonymous Fri 17 Sep 20:20:45 2021 No.13653394 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>13653461 >>13653570

Asking this here because I don't trust the shizos over at /pol/.

What went wrong in the studies? What doesnt the fda know?

1 post and 1 image omitted

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 17 Sep 2021 20:37:50 No.13653461 Report

Quoted By: >>13653528

>>13653394
>being this late to the party
Sci has been trying to warn you for months

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 17 Sep 2021 20:58:39 No.13653528 Report

Quoted By:

>>13653461
it was 60/40 on sci. vax shills are nowhere to be found today though.

They can't even admit they were wrong, pathetic.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO COVID19-VaxStatus_July16-Aug15.png, 201KiB, 1200x628

Anonymous Fri 17 Sep 2021 21:06:41 No.13653570 Report

Quoted By:

>>13653394
Not a medfag, but the vaccine still protects most people from hospitalization and death. So your average vaccinated person does not need a booster. Maybe an immune compromised person or an elderly person might need one. But the FDA was voting on whether to recommend boosters for everybody. Which is obviously what money-grubbing Pfizer wants- the government paying them to give everyone medicine they don't really need. So FDA had to step in and say that's not necessary.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 17 Sep 2021 23:59:30 No.13654109 Report

Quoted By:

>reason 1 they voted no: Pfizer provided little data on the safety of extra doses
>reason 2 they voted no: doubts about the value of mass boosters, rather than ones targeted to specific groups (older Americans and other high-risk groups)
>"I don’t think a booster dose is going to significantly contribute to controlling the pandemic and I think it’s important that the main message we transmit is that we’ve got to get everyone two doses."
>IT IS CLEAR THAT THE UNVACCINATED ARE DRIVING TRANSMISSION IN THE UNITED STATES
Also they just approved it for 65 and up.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 18 Sep 2021 01:06:44 No.13654242 Report

Quoted By:

>>13653449
t. schizo

170KiB, 2123x1413, gettyimages-824853668-1560870808 (1).jpg

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Fri 17 Sep 16:18:58 2021 No.13652551 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>13653894

Does better sperm quality mean better offspring quality?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 17 Sep 2021 16:21:52 No.13652558 Report

Quoted By:

Does better fertilizer mean better plants?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 17 Sep 2021 16:31:38 No.13652602 Report

Quoted By: >>13654034

no, it means better chance at having offspring

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 17 Sep 2021 22:26:54 No.13653894 Report

Quoted By: >>13654034

>>13652551
not really, ovum is much more important in that regard.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 17 Sep 2021 23:31:47 No.13654034 Report

Quoted By: >>13654226

>>13652602
>>13653894
False, better sperm = smarter babies. This should surprise nobody because like things tend to clump together. Better in one area = probably better in other areas.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S016028960800161X?via%3Dihub

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 18 Sep 2021 00:51:02 No.13654226 Report

Quoted By:

>>13654034
I don't understand how they came up with that conclusion, it seems like just an assumption

3KiB, 225x225, 1613308279290.png

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Fri 17 Sep 17:44:00 2021 No.13652847 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>13654225

who are you quoting?

3 posts omitted

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 17 Sep 2021 21:10:41 No.13653599 Report

Quoted By: >>13653816 >>13653844 >>13653875

>_

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 17 Sep 2021 21:58:05 No.13653816 Report

Quoted By:

>>13653599
>99
DOUBLE DIGITS
I CHECKED
I AM GOING INSAAAAANE

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 17 Sep 2021 22:09:13 No.13653844 Report

Quoted By: >>13653875

>>13653599
>_<
checked >_<

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 17 Sep 2021 22:19:52 No.13653875 Report

Quoted By:

>>13653599
>>13653844
WHAT IS HAPPENING
WHAAAAAAAAAAA

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO theoretical physics.jpg, 50KiB, 832x334

Anonymous Sat 18 Sep 2021 00:50:44 No.13654225 Report

Quoted By:

>>13652847
>who are you quoting?

10KiB, 258x195, yoda.jpg

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Fri 17 Sep 19:10:48 2021 No.13653208 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>13653516

Find published scientific paper with 0 citations in it.

4 posts omitted

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 17 Sep 2021 19:28:52 No.13653257 Report

Quoted By:

>Can n^2 + 1 unit equilateral triangles cover an equilateral triangle of side > n, say n + e?
by John Conway and Alexander Soifer
The body comprises of 1 word, 1 formula, and 2 figures

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 17 Sep 2021 20:55:45 No.13653516 Report

Quoted By: >>13653902 >>13654155

>>13653208
All citations inevitably lead to a source that either has no references or makes the former self-referential. This is a consequence of basic graph theory by the way.
Academia's obsession around citations has to do with the following.
The obsession of academics with getting their papers referenced by others because this is apparently a good metric of how much of a good scientist someone is aka rampant academic narcissism.
Making sure that people don't enter unchartered lands, aka no wrongthink.
Because knowledge can be copyrighted and is a material to consume, buy and sell like everything else aka reducing science to a capitalist tool.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO f63.jpg, 41KiB, 396x382

Anonymous Fri 17 Sep 2021 22:29:30 No.13653902 Report

Quoted By:

>>13653516
>aka reducing science to a capitalist tool.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 18 Sep 2021 00:15:21 No.13654155 Report

Quoted By: >>13654195

>>13653516
You were right up to the last sentence. Turns out most academics don't do it for money, they do it for the prestige and social recognition. This is why do much "research" is of negative economic value, and why so many expensive degrees train people for professions that aren't economically viable.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 18 Sep 2021 00:37:38 No.13654195 Report

Quoted By:

>>13654155
Another Jewish swindle of the century

>Make journal in shitty synagogue
>Convince fellow Jew professors to publish in journal and cite each other
>Goyim gets fooled and sends in papers
>Jews get free source of distributed knowledge they can collate for weapon designs for Israel
>Jews steal knowledge for private industry profiteering hidden behind "trade secrets"
>Pay back into fund to upkeep Journal
>Journal gains reputation and legitimacy among goyim
>Jews take over academia and the """objective""" voice

35KiB, 598x341, victory.png

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Fri 17 Sep 19:58:13 2021 No.13653327 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>13654124

So the faggots here saying boosters were needed are all big pharma shills, right?

8 posts omitted

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 17 Sep 2021 20:50:41 No.13653501 Report

Quoted By:

>>13653492
The absolute state of /sci/

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 18 Sep 2021 00:03:25 No.13654124 Report

Quoted By:

>>13653327
It was 16-2, the Pfizer rep at the meeting "accidentally" voted yes.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 18 Sep 2021 00:23:15 No.13654173 Report

Quoted By: >>13654190

>>13653337
this, this was to give the impression of careful deliberation for midwits like op.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 18 Sep 2021 00:35:56 No.13654190 Report

Quoted By:

>>13654173
Did you watch it? They asked a bunch of questions and there was no data to answer them, so the decision to juice up the 16+ couldn't be passed. Their whole argument boiled down to extrapolated data from old fucks in Israel and justifying it must be good for younger crowds.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 18 Sep 2021 00:36:46 No.13654193 Report

Quoted By:

>>13653492
Well put

129KiB, 1200x900, image-20150414-24648-1qcsga1.jpg

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

High-tech conversion therapy

Anonymous Fri 17 Sep 23:19:09 2021 No.13654002 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By:

Could science cure homos, trannies and pedos?

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24587962/

5 posts and 1 image omitted

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 18 Sep 2021 00:22:07 No.13654169 Report

Quoted By:

>>13654040
You're free to make any choice you want as long as it's from the list of approved choices.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 18 Sep 2021 00:28:47 No.13654182 Report

Quoted By:

>>13654010
swords, spears, axes, arrows, clubs, rocks - how the times have changed. The cure always existed.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 18 Sep 2021 00:33:37 No.13654187 Report

Quoted By:

>>13654162
Wow. You just realize you can us this in debate with pro-life/pro-choice shit? THAT would spice up that conversation. I'd want to the looks of everyone's faces. Nice job, anon.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO cover0117_subscriber.jpg, 1MiB, 2063x3000

Anonymous Sat 18 Sep 2021 00:35:39 No.13654188 Report

Quoted By:

>>13654040

Medical researchers are in a better position to prevent the harms that would result if reorientation techniques were safe, effective and widely available. We argue that the harms attendant on the development of safe and effective re-orientation techniques give researchers reason to avoid ‘applied‘ research aimed at developing these techniques, and to be careful in the conduct of basic orientation research which might be applied in this way.

https://jme.bmj.com/content/42/6/340

But changing your sex is heckin cute and valid though, especially if you're a child. Even though it is mental illness and HRT increases the risk of cancer and cardiovascular diseases. Womb transplants for transwomen when?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 18 Sep 2021 00:36:13 No.13654192 Report

Quoted By:

>>13654162
It’s probably xenoestrogens and not genes

101KiB, 589x360, so true.jpg

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Fri 17 Sep 19:31:50 2021 No.13653267 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>13654137

Scientifically, what it it that attracts women to rape and murder fantasies? Shouldn't self-preservation instinct want women to NOT cream over the thought of a man molesting her and then slitting the throat? I find it really odd that women are supposedly touted as the "kind sex" when they literally dream about being fed to a pack of wolves by some sociopath. Why do they cry about #metoo when its literally their dream come true? Makes no sense, yet many neurological studies have shown that the thought of being raped sends the same signals in the female brain as the thought of passing an exam. WTF?

5 posts omitted

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 17 Sep 2021 23:06:38 No.13653974 Report

Quoted By:

women are attracted to power
/thread

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 18 Sep 2021 00:06:52 No.13654137 Report

Quoted By:

>>13653267
>hello, operator, I've never had sex and want to ensure all the people know this on the Bruneian log composting forum I post to
>how can you ensure this message gets across??

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 18 Sep 2021 00:08:07 No.13654139 Report

Quoted By:

Anyone trying to defend the honor of women who get off to being raped is an incel pretending not to be an incel.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 18 Sep 2021 00:26:32 No.13654178 Report

Quoted By: >>13654181

A woman I dated in college sent me a link request on LinkedIn a few days ago. On her LinkedIn profile was her membership in a group called the 'Murderinos' which apparently is "A person who is interested in, especially obsessed with, murders. Including serial murderers, spree killers and rage/thrill killers" and consumes podcasts and other media dedicated to the subject.
Seems like an odd thing to put on one's LinkedIn account. I ignored her link request. Who needs that kind of weirdness in their life?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 18 Sep 2021 00:27:55 No.13654181 Report

Quoted By:

>>13654178
yeah I wouldn't add her any time soon

72KiB, 960x720, slide_12.jpg

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Fri 17 Sep 22:39:57 2021 No.13653930 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By:

What is the analytical solution to the Navier-Stokes equations?

12 posts omitted

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 18 Sep 2021 00:01:11 No.13654116 Report

Quoted By: >>13654130

>>13654102
What makes you think solving Navier-Stokes numerically is quick and simple or even gives accurate results without very small, and hence resource intensive, grid sizes?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 18 Sep 2021 00:05:28 No.13654130 Report

Quoted By: >>13654176

>>13654116
I believe it is faster and simpler than finding the analytical solution.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 18 Sep 2021 00:06:21 No.13654133 Report

Quoted By:

>>13654060
you clearly don't have a clue

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 18 Sep 2021 00:11:33 No.13654141 Report

Quoted By:

If I had to guess analytical solutions do exist. I believe the problem will be solved by exploring the equation's connection to the Nash embedding theorem, though that kind of thing is absolutely in its infancy right now, I'd give it 25 years at least.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 18 Sep 2021 00:25:06 No.13654176 Report

Quoted By:

>>13654130
Then you'd be wrong.

95KiB, 1030x437, productive-corporate-meetings-trainings-1030x437.jpg

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Fri 17 Sep 02:36:53 2021 No.13650674 View Reply Last 50 Original Report

Quoted By:

>having good time in lab
>doing work and talking to cute lab tech girl
>laptop makes bing sound. Time for daily the project meeting
>have to leave lab and sit in a call for 1 hour while people talk some boring shit I dont care about
Scientifically speaking how do we remove meetings? I want to be left alone in the lab.

71 posts and 2 images omitted

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 17 Sep 2021 23:51:10 No.13654088 Report

Quoted By: >>13654092 >>13654108

>>13654072
Okay, now implement quality controls and economies of scale. Tell me about intellectual property. We are really on our way to solving all the problems of society here. Groundbreaking stuff.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 17 Sep 2021 23:53:18 No.13654092 Report

Quoted By: >>13654161

>>13654088
Hes not aware yet that he has rejected the very concept of the organization, so for him there cant be economies of scale. The biggest economic organization for him should be independent craftmen like bakers. Which is ok desu.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 17 Sep 2021 23:58:49 No.13654108 Report

Quoted By: >>13654113 >>13654161

>>13654075
>>13654088
>>13654074

listen, I don't know why I have to convince you a man keeping the fruit of his own labor just. I don't know why you are arguing so hard for exploitation and slavery, but I'm going to leave this discussion here. Perhaps, you are like spongebob. You just want to make crabby patties for Mr.Krabs and that just gets you off like a subservient twat, but I and billions of people would rather keep the profits, instead of it all going to Mr.Krabs while he sits in his office counting money all day. There are reacord corporate profits in the US while many work and still collect welfare, so the taxpayer is supporting the billionaires employee. You seem to like this. Good for you. I'm sure it had nothing to do with 70 years of intense propaganda.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 18 Sep 2021 00:00:49 No.13654113 Report

Quoted By:

>>13654108
Bitch how is a single baker making bread in his shop "an organization"?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 18 Sep 2021 00:18:34 No.13654161 Report

Quoted By:

>>13654092
>>13654108

I'm just finding it astonishing that someone can pseud so hard and remain confident in their ideas despite the fact that all priors show their idea will fail due to rationality long before the capitalist boogeyman even noticed.
I'd honestly be very interested in having an conversation to make the world's value creation more decentralized, but it would require some kind of organization to compete (there are a lot of companies that exist to do precisely this already) and in order to be successful in any meaningful way against TPTB therefore its out of the question for this thread apparently.
Also it shows very little life experience in failing to understand how incompetent that average person is in every corner of globe. So incompetent they can't even serve the common interest against this "Mr. Krabs" because they wouldn't even know what to do with their "labor" to create value if they took the advice and quit their jobs tomorrow. Again, Khmer Rouge (or any major communist revolution), you can't force people to become peasant farmers. You will only guarantee famine and bloodshed as people organize inefficiently for security rather than prosperity.

>inb4 US BOMBS CHILDREN REEE

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Threads by latest replies - Page 2611

Your latest searches

Medschool fags and doctors, can you tell me why FDA voted against boosters?

High-tech conversion therapy