>>10463183>What are you suggesting would cause the reversal?Improper variable weightings and incomplete information, the usual suspects as far as completely fucking up any kind of predictive model.
>So surely you can cite someI'm not going to trove through everything from that time period. Here's a model that was incorrect thus far:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avoiding_Dangerous_Climate_Change_(2005_conference)Their trajectory was off. And I saved the model you posted so in 5 years I can show that one was off too. Extrapolation is such a bitch.
>>10463184I'm trying not to jump to conclusions. We've had "the warmest years in a century" and yet we've only just been collecting official climate data in this past century, and the century prior to that experienced mass cooling which, naturally, begets a regression to the mean (i.e. "warming"). It doesn't mean the planet is going to undergo cataclysmic warming moving forward. Scientists are regularly wrong, seriously, so much that was accepted in the past is eventually revealed to be bunk. They aren't paid to be right.
