>>11226501>The reasons are that CO2 level changes follow temperature changes nit the other way around.
Incorrect. Both are true. CO2 causes warming via the greenhouse effect, and warming causes CO2 to outgas from the oceans. We can directly measure the greenhouse effect from CO2 via radiative spectroscopy, and it matches the observed radiative forcing. We can see whether man or the oceans are causing the increase in CO2 which is causing that radiative forcing by looking at the carbon isotope ratio. It shows that the increase in CO2 is wholly due to man. In fact, natural sinks absorb more CO2 than natural sources emit, so the effect of our emissions should be even worse than what we observe.>Also the global temperature follows solar activity for as long as it has bee recorded.
Wrong. Pic related. >Also the global temperature average went down from about 1950 to 1970 while CO2 levels kept increasing.
Because of aerosol emissions causing cooling. >Then finally CO2 is good for plants
Are droughts good for plants?>life can easily tolerate up to 8000 ppm, but dies at 150ppm, so the idea that 200ppm was ideal is retarded.
Who said 200 ppm is ideal? Also, at 8000 ppm humans would be severely cognitively impaired, even if you ignore the utter devastation global warming would cause at that level. >Also global warming is better than global cooling.
This is like saying "being obese is better than starving" in order to avoid going on a diet.