>>5137053And I'm saying you are wrong and it's your word against easily proven fact.
The primary colors were not selected arbitrarily, and cultural significance has nothing to do with it. Only a total moron would suggest something like that in the first place, and the fact that you then tried to pretend something he posted was a direct quote is hilarious.
>>5137323>with nothing to hang onto Other than the entire field of colorimetry and well established scientific fact?
You're right, on top of actual knowledge of color theory I should throw in some incoherent fanfiction like you have, "le sigh".