>>98442841>>98442902Anon that's fantastic.
If you want real technical criticism, I'd say look at blurring your lines a little, and maybe reduce the saturation. If you look at your lines and those on the original side-by-side, you'll see that the original lines are very soft. Have you ever seen on old cartoons when something on a foreground cell looks brighter than the background so you know it's going to move? That's sort of the effect you get when your lines and fills look more vivid than the background. You might also try a vector line tool, since there's a pixelly outline on the straps, and the suspenders on the upper bikini make a slightly imperfect arc at the tip.
Still, this is all nitpicky; I only point it out because you seem to want tips on how to get better. What you have right now is still really good.
