>>95440351Does it really matter the exact pose if it's not eroticized? All the comments here are pointing out how revolted they are and usually by now we'd have a half dozen dipshits talking about which 12 year old is their waifu. Dicks and vaginas aren't exactly a 1 to 1 thing where we easily can rationalize why penises can be shown on air but not vaginas.
The truth is that South Park gets away with it because no one thinks anyone's getting aroused by it, it doesn't even occur to most people that it would turn anyone on. For whatever reason that rule's just completely different for girls, even when the genitals look like fucking this
>>95440059and aren't even shown attached to a body. If Cartman's dick jumped off his fat sweaty taint and bunched up the foreskin to look like a hoodie while rapping about all the embarassing shit that makes Cartman erect, we'd all think that's fucking hilarious. Or stupid, if we didn't like the bit. No one would really care to argue that it shouldn't exist because a pedo might hypothetically attempt to fap to it as a challenge, it'd just be a bunch of contrarians arguing whether South Park is funny anymore or not.
The lesson here is that cultural mores are weird and gender norms have a major impact on who we deem worthy of protection from perceived threats. Either we're OK with animated kid genitals or we're not, it's hard to justify showing one sex but not the other.
