>>91407900That's because Zach is hard on himself. He doesn't pinch off something and say "That was amazing, anyone who dislikes this is wrong". He takes criticism to heart, which is why he's grown so much as an animator, and also why he might even get a TV deal. Or not, if him and Oney fuck up Hellbenders with their catfighting.
>>91407925I'm talking to you, Chris. I'm willing to believe a lot of things, but not the idea that you have three fans. Let alone three fans on /co/, who just happen to be hanging out on this thread for the sole purpose of shitting on anyone who criticizes your work, which desperately needs improvement.
>I dont care what the fans think, i want to follow my visionCongratulations, you're now George Lucas. Minus the multi billion dollars in your account and a legacy that will live on forever.
>>91407910A common shill tactic is to include an innocuous post so it looks more "natural". Think of it like rigging an election. If you get 100% of the votes, that's suspicious. But 80%? Not so much. Besides, if you can understand the brilliance of HDD' s satire then you should be able to comprehend anything, you little genius you
>>91407991>I haven't really watched literally any of those>haven't really>literally anyHahaha. Anyways, another white knight shows up. Interesting. It's funny, I've seen a lot of threads detailing a lot of people and this is the only one where people are this persistent about replying to every single post that isn't "He's a genus i luv him" . I know that /co/ is closer to Tumblr than it is to 4chan, but this is still very out of character. Not even Spongebob posts have this number of suspiciously timed responses attempting to downvote dissent. Guess what: there are no downvotes here.
>>91408079Yes I can. I just need a blood sample from everyone and a hot needle.
