>>83406525People complain about feminists all the time still. We're doing it right now. The problem was Sinfest was a lightning rod because it was actually something enjoyable once. Then Tatsuya lost his cotton picking mind and the entire comic became bizarre feminist propaganda.
Worse than another feminist comic, people actually cared about these characters and watched them get assassinated and hollowed out. It was banned because the threads were that bad. Pokemon wasn't banned from /v/ because it was terrible, but because it basically took over the board. Same thing with the horses that shall not be named or posted.
Look at, since we mentioned it, DoA. Thread after thread is people shitting on the comics SJW slant, and SJWs in general. But those aren't banned. People complain in these threads and they aren't banned. We have threads shitting on SJWs and liberal politics in comics and cartoon all the time. Look at all those recent Red Skull threads (though I'm not sure if the allure wore off for people or if mods actually clamped down on them. I avoided them because they were completely devoid of anything interesting comics-wise).
Things like the Batgirl Joker Variant cover getting censored get banned for awhile because, as this anon said
>>83406669, anons get so angry at stuff sometimes they threaten to burn the whole board to the ground in their rage. Such things only happen because, it turns out, /co/ is still 4chan and the hate of modern American liberalism, SJWs, and feminism runs strong enough to ignite their passionate rage. And enough trolls exist to fuel it too. And yes, probably some actual SJWs. And while a nice Burning Man is good once in awhile, /co/ is not the "FIRE, EVERYTHING IS FIRE" board. It is the "comics and cartoons, which may contain some fire directly related to such but not exclusively so" board.
Also, we had a full Criminy and Fucshia subplot storytime some time ago. God, I feel like I'm just waiting for him to fuck that up.
