>>122618992The main thing people seem to be grappling with is that capitalism is the process of increasing centralization while Darwinism requires decentralization. For instance the Marxist end-goal of capitalism is full centralization (i.e. homogenization), which is why Nietzsche describes it as anti-life, because at that point there is no more Darwin involved. You have reached an "end state" (and, directly related, end of states)
Look let's not kid ourselves, there's a flaw in the Matrix here, where capitalism inevitability pushes itself toward the gray-goo state of full centralized homogeneity
All post-banking/Industrial Revolution ideological systems are an attempt to grapple with this problem.
Communism sees this drive as a good thing (also why it believed the entire world has to be communist for it to succeed), fascism wants to tame this for the benefit of the nation, liberal democracy survived a while longer but is now making itself an atrocious marriage of the two.
So yeah, Libs and Leftoids weirdly go well together because both want to centrilize power, both think that it is moraly justifiable, all that changes is who "should be in charge". Logical conclusion is something sort of like China. The difference on the west is that on China the governament kills the billionaires that step out of line, while on the west the Billionaires are the one really in charge.
