>>115046344>he thought I was talking about noumenoic universe this entire time as "Existence">in an argument about human moral obligationsDamn, I was just trying to get a rise out of you by calling you retarded, but I'm genuinely disappointed in you now anon.
I want you to think really, really hard as to why the human subjective existence is axiomatically good. Really activate those almonds, anon.
>>115046385No, I'm saying that "existence is neither good nor bad" is a fundamentally nonsensical position that upends the entirety of all moral thought. If you were to hold that as a position, it'd be entirely reasonable to say that murder, for example, is not an objectionable action. Infringing on a person's will or life is not an offense at all, because there is no inherent value in human existence.
THAT is why it is a nonsense statement. It's even more nonsense than saying that existence is bad.
>You even reduced the results down to two possibilities, too: MARRY & REPRODUCE or DIE IN A FIRE.Where's the "DIE IN A FIRE" coming from, anon? I never said there was a punishment for failing to reproduce, only that is a moral obligation to do so.
Your issue is that you actually haven't understood the argument I'm presenting, and are arguing from a fedora-tipping perspective against an imagined christian enemy. Moreso, you're almost certainly letting your own prejudices of what reproduction entails to argue against a fate that you, personally, find objectionable.
