You can't be this stupid. Witness here:>>107966340
I will include the whole text of it for you so you may not avoid it.>It's not really something you can explain away either. When you have stuff like Rebecca Sugar drawing smut of underage cartoon characters in college that's one thing, it's sketchy but at least it's harmless and irrelevant in the grand scheme of things. It can be chalked up to an edgy early 20 something fucking about in their spare time. It's not defaming the property. The Steven Jewniverse thing is just "ha ha, jews" and that's the joke. Not really much wiggle room there.
This was disputed in the following post, which you replied to.>>107966569
I will include the whole text of it for you so you may not avoid it.>Uh no, it's both rapey and pedophilic. It's not quirky girl's nascent adulthood quirkiness, she's a freak drawing freakshit.
Instead of addressing the issue here, which is that there is a moral equivalence, you proceeded to avoid the actual point, which is that it's absolutely on the same level of depraved, and instead blathered on about the definition of rape. In your case, I do have to bring up the glaringly obvious, because you either have the memory and intelligence of a goldfish, or you're a dishonest piece of shit.