>>101532286>I also called them inventive and well executed
That's just as vague as saying "they're good" unless you go into more detail>Now what arc from King's run was better than those two and why?
I am Gotham at least laid the groundwork for some interesting new ideas on ways to look at Batman's relationship with Gotham. King quickly abandoned that for muh depression, though. I'm not going to defend I am Suicide or WoJaR, but at least I am Bane had good action scenes, or at least ones far better than what we got recently. > Remember that you're attacking my statement about Booster and Ivy arcs being better than rest of King's run
True, but the original argument was that you believed that /co/ was justified in liking King as of recent, implying that not only is he better than the incredibly low bar set before, but he's actually good now. You have yet to defend that argument aside from "it's good because it's executed well" which is like defending a book by saying "I liked the writing."