>>100321819>Star Wars isn't Sci-Fi, but that it's "science fantasy". Why? Because it's so "soft" sci-fi that it's literally just a fantasy story that uses sci-fi elements for styleNo, because there's magic in Star Wars. Both magic and tech can exist separately in the same universe, and they can interact in interesting ways.
>Lightsabers could just as easily be swordsAt times, but they're not, swords are not nearly as powerful or versatile as burning hot plasma that can cut through anything
> droids might as well be slaves or golemsNo, this would have massively different implications storywise.
>the force is basically magicThe Force IS magic, even with the midichlorians thing, the force never stopped being magic.
>The setting has strayed so far from having modern day science and advanced to the point that it's indistinguishable from magic.No, no it hasn't, no one with 4 brain cells would claim the Death Star or robots and spaceships are magic.
>>100321834Nature quite literally means exist outside of humans or not created by them.
