>>90363584But he's being kind of arrogant, if he said that much more politely and he wouldn't have had those reactions.
Look at Kristen for example, the way she wrote made her look very calm and reasonable. People are not machines, the way you say something does matter, that guy instead looked like he was triggered by the first tweet (althought Twitter is the perfect place for misunderstanding).
Also, it's not too difficult to understand the reasoning that they were making: for a long time society didn't gave the same opportunities to both sexes, and even now that men and women have theoretically the same rights, some insicure girl might still feel troubled by the thought of trying jobs that until now have storically shown a low percentage of women, and get discouraged even if they know they'd love doing it (or instead make a Tumblr and bleat at the patriachy like a flock). So, even if I still find a little bit cringey to hear/read stuff as the tweet they discussed, I can see where the reasoning might come from: to incourage those girls, and I see nothing wrong about that intention (I still think think it would be better not put much relevance into one's gender to have real equality, but in the end everyone acts the way he/she prefers).
Plus, the tweet was not about some bullshit about women needing quotas or something like that, so I think that's a proof of my point.
Also, the crew never seemed to me a group of SJWs or stuff like that. I mean, just look at the show. They didn't even use buzzwords like "misoginy" or "patriarchy" or whatever, and even Zach (he was kind of a prick too, tho) or Sabrina's final pissed comments seemed mostly ironic. You need to read the context case by case (who said exactly what and how, to determine why).
So, trying to have contrasts like this only invalidates our opinions, because it may push the people on the other "side" to slowly associate them with sexists, like femminazis do. Just talk calmly and read the context.
My opinion.
