>>9823963>During the course of it, their intent is to put you on the defensive. They interrogate you until they understand the limits of your knowledge. It can’t be only your work, but the status of the field you are in.We live in an age of digital, decentralised, vast, democratic and (to an extent) free knowledge. Knovel, elsevier, wiley, etc.
What is the point of proving to 'know' something?
