>>9825693You just shoved words into my mouth. I simply provided an argument to play devil's advocate. You've failed miserably to create a counterargument, because your picture is an attempt to garner pity for civilizations that failed to adapt.
>muh area and cultureThey were both shit because they failed to keep up.
Guess what the distinct difference in those civilizations were? Race. I'm not going to waste my time arguing with you any further. You are simply too stupid to properly argue without inventing information (based on emotion) to support your argument.
>>9825708IQ is a means to test one's ability to recognize and understand new problems (mainly attempting to use pattern recognition to achieve this), then solve problems in a timely manner. Sorry that you failed to adapt, and subsequently can't keep up with what is being stated. IQ tests were designed as a tool, not a science. Is that too big for your tiny head?
You should both go to reddit, a site much more suited for pathetic brainlets such as yourselves.
