/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #9674197

17KiB, 256x256, 1522926688979.jpg

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

CHOICE REACTION TIME

Anonymous Sun 15 Apr 21:30:01 2018 No.9674197 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>9674629 >>9674829 >>9674868 >>9674912 >>9676547 >>9676605 >>9676637 >>9676766 >>9677669 >>9677996 >>9679768 >>9681569

So what's your choice reaction time?
I heard it connects to intelligence at r = .5

Mine is 355 ms with 15% error, but 372 ms with 5% error

https://www.psytoolkit.org/lessons/experiment_simple_choice_rts.html

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 1508900625286.jpg, 27KiB, 500x508

Anonymous Mon 16 Apr 2018 01:07:40 No.9674629 Report

Quoted By:

>>9674197
I've been drinking. I got 361 m/s with 5% error. So you did pretty well anon

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 16 Apr 2018 01:19:53 No.9674651 Report

Quoted By:

241 ms on the one box space bar
356 on the multi choice

0% error rate cause I am not a scrub. All those video game playing paid off it seems.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 16 Apr 2018 01:48:37 No.9674707 Report

Quoted By:

425 ms with 0% error
300 ms on simple reaction

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO Untitled.png, 67KiB, 830x515

Anonymous Mon 16 Apr 2018 02:16:05 No.9674760 Report

Quoted By: >>9674764 >>9674806 >>9674863 >>9674918

just for reference, I have a 103 IQ

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 16 Apr 2018 02:17:07 No.9674764 Report

Quoted By:

>>9674760
oh and I'm 26. i remember age affecting this.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO AHHH.png, 42KiB, 1193x260

Anonymous Mon 16 Apr 2018 02:19:25 No.9674770 Report

Quoted By:

>tfw below average

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 1504879549382.jpg, 73KiB, 721x960

Anonymous Mon 16 Apr 2018 02:40:33 No.9674806 Report

Quoted By: >>9674811

>>9674760
>I have a 103 IQ

How did you find this out?

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 16 Apr 2018 02:44:00 No.9674811 Report

Quoted By: >>9674824

>>9674806
WAIS-IV at age 19

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 16 Apr 2018 02:50:24 No.9674824 Report

Quoted By: >>9674827 >>9674838 >>9679773

>>9674811
What was your SAT score?

I got 1150 on mine, and I figured out to just treat the XCBNM like they're electrodes on your finger, and you'll get a better score, so I'm at 350 with 5% failure rate

The weird thing is that it's 117 IQ, but if you're 103 IQ and I can't best you, that means I'm probably 95-105 IQ too

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 16 Apr 2018 02:52:05 No.9674827 Report

Quoted By: >>9674834

>>9674824
I got an 1190 on my SAT

specifically 600 and 590 on math and verbal, respectively.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 16 Apr 2018 02:52:50 No.9674829 Report

Quoted By: >>9674830 >>9674831 >>9674832

>>9674197
>muscle memory is related to intelligence

No.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 16 Apr 2018 02:53:33 No.9674830 Report

Quoted By:

>>9674829
Retard.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 16 Apr 2018 02:53:52 No.9674831 Report

Quoted By:

>>9674829
https://lesacreduprintemps19.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/clocking-the-mind-mental-chronometry-and-individual-differences.pdf

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 16 Apr 2018 02:54:33 No.9674832 Report

Quoted By: >>9678005

>>9674829
studies show that choice reaction time is a better predictor of IQ than head circumference and forehead size.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 16 Apr 2018 02:56:25 No.9674834 Report

Quoted By: >>9674846

>>9674827
Are you sure the 103 is accurate for you?

19 is kind of young to be able to take something like that without a shit-load of pressure.

I've actually bombed internet tests over stress

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 16 Apr 2018 02:57:46 No.9674835 Report

Quoted By:

469ms 15% error kek
Don't know my IQ

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 16 Apr 2018 02:59:43 No.9674838 Report

Quoted By: >>9674843

>>9674824
Not him, but I increased my SAT score from 1290 to 1520.

710 verbal 580 math originally, after a year and a half of going through /sci/ memebooks like the gelfand and serge lang books, and reading more in general: 730 and 790. it's pretty trainable, unlike the old SAT, where a lot of the IQ-SAT studies got their datasets from.
I took a general battery intelligence exam when I was getting diagnosed for ADD and came back as 127, if you care to know.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 16 Apr 2018 03:01:13 No.9674842 Report

Quoted By: >>9674847 >>9674862

>r=0.5
wow its fucking nothing

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 16 Apr 2018 03:01:18 No.9674843 Report

Quoted By: >>9674851

>>9674838
What do you get on the choice reaction in this thread?

That's pretty incredible

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 16 Apr 2018 03:01:36 No.9674846 Report

Quoted By: >>9674859

>>9674834
Well, I've always taken it to be accurate. It's possible I might have an attention related disorder since I bombed the working memory subtest, and got a below average score on the processing speed section.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 16 Apr 2018 03:02:53 No.9674847 Report

Quoted By:

>>9674842
>r = .5
>Nothing

a 1:1 is perfect "Just give him this test to find out how smart he is"

With .5, you get an idea of how smart you are

If you soar way over everyone else, you're probably smart.

If you're just like everyone else, you're probably average.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO test.png, 50KiB, 692x405

Anonymous Mon 16 Apr 2018 03:05:29 No.9674851 Report

Quoted By: >>9674863 >>9674873

>>9674843
Damn. I fucked up bad on the choice.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 16 Apr 2018 03:09:36 No.9674859 Report

Quoted By: >>9674864

>>9674846
>bombed something that gets fried under pressure

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Effects_of_stress_on_memory

People take real IQ tests and jump 10 points all of the time.

I feel like I'm rationalizing your IQ score to make-up for my deficits in CRT, but you know better than I do if you did your best possible on the WAIS

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO lol.png, 21KiB, 760x159

Anonymous Mon 16 Apr 2018 03:10:58 No.9674862 Report

Quoted By: >>9674913

>>9674842
>0.5 is fucking nothing
Here's the correlation between brain volume and g.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 16 Apr 2018 03:11:10 No.9674863 Report

Quoted By: >>9674867

>>9674760
>>9674851
These are two totally different intelligence levels, but they're similar CRT scores.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 16 Apr 2018 03:12:32 No.9674864 Report

Quoted By:

>>9674859
To be fair, I didn't do good on the vocab section and general knowledge subtest either, both of which are pretty g-loaded. I probably would have done better if I was slightly less nervous, and I'm sure I'd do better now on meds.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 16 Apr 2018 03:13:33 No.9674867 Report

Quoted By:

>>9674863
One of them also has ADD

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 16 Apr 2018 03:13:33 No.9674868 Report

Quoted By: >>9674870 >>9674873 >>9674879

>>9674197
protip: monitor refresh rate increases your reaction time

anecdotally evident in https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rjci8cMu3DI
but it also makes sense
there are no studies i found on reaction time and monitor refresh rate in my short google but i also switched monitors for this reaction test and improved 50ms on both ish

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 16 Apr 2018 03:14:34 No.9674870 Report

Quoted By:

>>9674868
this

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO ref.png, 15KiB, 435x446

Anonymous Mon 16 Apr 2018 03:16:11 No.9674873 Report

Quoted By: >>9674897

>>9674868
I'm
>>9674851
And this is my refresh rate.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 16 Apr 2018 03:22:33 No.9674879 Report

Quoted By:

>>9674868
>tfw OP and 60hz monitor

Huh

Guess I can cut 34 ms off of my scores.

I must be grease lightning and not even know it.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO OP.jpg, 44KiB, 768x483

Anonymous Mon 16 Apr 2018 03:34:22 No.9674897 Report

Quoted By: >>9674905 >>9676599

>>9674873
I think I just realized something major as the OP

If you're not approaching the CRT the right way, you won't get an accurate score.

You need to treat the slots in front of your eyes like they're representations of your fingers on the keyboard, or you will get a bad score.

I just got this 316 on a 60 Hz monitor without any error due to practice, and that's in direct defiance of any g loading.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO score.png, 74KiB, 1367x655

Anonymous Mon 16 Apr 2018 03:37:05 No.9674904 Report

Quoted By: >>9674907 >>9674910 >>9676555

Seems like bullshit. My IQ is somewhere in the 140s and I'm doing fine in undergrad.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 16 Apr 2018 03:38:06 No.9674905 Report

Quoted By: >>9674912

>>9674897
what was your original score?

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 16 Apr 2018 03:39:06 No.9674907 Report

Quoted By:

>>9674904
You might actually be retarded

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 16 Apr 2018 03:40:29 No.9674910 Report

Quoted By:

>>9674904
Surprisingly accurate

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 16 Apr 2018 03:41:06 No.9674912 Report

Quoted By: >>9674918

>>9674905
It was
>>9674197

That's a gap that's too big to ignore.
This means a lot of people in this thread are at a huge disadvantage because they approached this the wrong way

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 16 Apr 2018 03:41:24 No.9674913 Report

Quoted By: >>9674935

>>9674862
it's also fucking nothing

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 16 Apr 2018 03:43:28 No.9674918 Report

Quoted By:

>>9674912
i'm
>>9674760
and that's how I initially approached it

I still flub it since my right hand is more dominant than my left. nice work. you could probably break sub-300.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 1519432080160.jpg, 196KiB, 580x580

Anonymous Mon 16 Apr 2018 03:50:01 No.9674935 Report

Quoted By: >>9674940 >>9674943 >>9674945

>>9674913
>Measured head circumference
>Got 573 mm
>Measured CRT reaction time
>The raw score is 284 ms
>Fastest recorded reaction ever is .194 ms on an iphone

Does anyone know if .5 x .5 means anything at all?

I think I'm average

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 16 Apr 2018 03:52:00 No.9674940 Report

Quoted By: >>9674946

>>9674935
You got 284 on choice? damn

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 16 Apr 2018 03:53:23 No.9674943 Report

Quoted By: >>9674946

>>9674935
>tfw 558 mm head circumference
>CRT ITT was 312 w/ 5% error
f-fuck

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 16 Apr 2018 03:54:23 No.9674945 Report

Quoted By:

>>9674935
funnily enough, head circumference is r=0.26, as opposed to the 0.4 for brain volume

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 16 Apr 2018 03:54:49 No.9674946 Report

Quoted By:

>>9674940
>>9674943
That's because my monitor is 60 Hz
You guys probably have the same kind.

Just subtract 30 ms to get to 144 Hz

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 16 Apr 2018 03:57:30 No.9674949 Report

Quoted By:

It's always funny to see just how insecure /sci/ can get when it comes to IQ.

I'd bet if a study came out saying that toe webbing width had an r=.42 correlation with g, you'd have autists here pull out their calipers and take the average of 5 different measurements.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 16 Apr 2018 20:14:09 No.9676547 Report

Quoted By:

>>9674197
I love shit like this.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 16 Apr 2018 20:16:35 No.9676555 Report

Quoted By:

>>9674904
Reaction time and intelligence don't perfectly correlate

It's plausible you could have a really bad reaction time and be a genius, but it's more likely that you at least have an average reaction time.

There's a lot of evidence that proves that sport stars are in the upper echelon of intelligence for their respective race.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO pajeet.png, 21KiB, 688x442

Anonymous Mon 16 Apr 2018 20:35:24 No.9676599 Report

Quoted By:

>>9674897
I might try again with that in mind.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 16 Apr 2018 20:36:40 No.9676605 Report

Quoted By: >>9678009

>>9674197
Mine is like 80 ms but then again I am a second degree blackbelt in Taekwon-do.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 16 Apr 2018 20:43:02 No.9676637 Report

Quoted By: >>9676645

>>9674197
Simple: 245ms 0%error
Choice: 411ms 15% error (autism)

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 16 Apr 2018 20:46:16 No.9676645 Report

Quoted By:

>>9676637
2nd try
325 0%
364 5%

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 16 Apr 2018 21:18:49 No.9676737 Report

Quoted By: >>9676793

156, 0% @ Single choice
241, 0% @ Mutliple choice

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO file.png, 44KiB, 713x425

Anonymous Mon 16 Apr 2018 21:26:20 No.9676766 Report

Quoted By:

>>9674197
IQ of about 22 I feel like, never tested though.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 16 Apr 2018 21:36:52 No.9676793 Report

Quoted By: >>9676798 >>9677525

>>9676737
IQ?

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 16 Apr 2018 21:39:19 No.9676798 Report

Quoted By: >>9676804 >>9676867

>>9676793
184

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 16 Apr 2018 21:41:11 No.9676804 Report

Quoted By: >>9676867

>>9676798
nice
i'm 167 and barely sentient

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 16 Apr 2018 22:05:06 No.9676867 Report

Quoted By: >>9676962 >>9677527 >>9677528

>>9676798
>>9676804
And how did you get tested for these IQs?

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 16 Apr 2018 22:05:30 No.9676869 Report

Quoted By:

>this is where funding for psychology goes

even someone with 68 chromosomes could tell you that choosing from zero things is faster and easier than choosing from four things

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 16 Apr 2018 22:42:11 No.9676962 Report

Quoted By:

>>9676867
by paying

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 17 Apr 2018 03:08:19 No.9677525 Report

Quoted By: >>9677528 >>9679290

>>9676793

Formally tested thrice.

SB IQ170, Wechsler IQ166, and a relatively poor score following with a Cattel IQ190...

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 17 Apr 2018 03:09:18 No.9677527 Report

Quoted By:

>>9676867
Psychologist

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 17 Apr 2018 03:17:26 No.9677528 Report

Quoted By: >>9677537

>>9676867
>>9677525

Let it be said that I do not believe IQ is an accurate representation of a person's facilitation for excellence nor their overall intellect, wisdom, or skillset.

It's merely a number marker for a person's ability to achieve results within the specific constraints of the testing scheme.

That it apparently necessitates greatness is something I contest to; I would postulate that IQ is actually a byproduct of other factors (genetic, environment, psychological) which contribute to the acheievement of 'greater' feats.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 17 Apr 2018 03:25:27 No.9677537 Report

Quoted By:

>>9677528
Wow, you are smart

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 17 Apr 2018 03:30:19 No.9677539 Report

Quoted By: >>9677623 >>9678012

200/300 after 2 15% beers, almost falling asleep in my chair

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 17 Apr 2018 04:29:31 No.9677623 Report

Quoted By:

>>9677539
IQ?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 17 Apr 2018 05:01:39 No.9677669 Report

Quoted By: >>9679250

>>9674197
here's the results lads
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21287123

for the 18-25 gap, they chose university of edinburgh students and city of edinburgh residents

you could probably reliably estimate your IQ from these results

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO mediocre-immortan.png, 92KiB, 252x252

Anonymous Tue 17 Apr 2018 09:55:03 No.9677996 Report

Quoted By:

>>9674197
>r = .5

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 17 Apr 2018 10:04:03 No.9678005 Report

Quoted By: >>9679777

>>9674832
>a better predictor of IQ than phrenology
...next you'll claim it's better than palmistry?
BLASPHEMY

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 17 Apr 2018 10:12:33 No.9678009 Report

Quoted By: >>9679798

>>9676605
aptitude + training

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 17 Apr 2018 10:14:34 No.9678012 Report

Quoted By:

>>9677539
>15% beers
wat

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 17 Apr 2018 10:19:20 No.9678013 Report

Quoted By: >>9679241

273ms, 0% error
372ms, 5% error
I'm 30.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 17 Apr 2018 20:35:59 No.9679241 Report

Quoted By:

>>9678013
You'll get better with effort

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 17 Apr 2018 20:39:02 No.9679250 Report

Quoted By: >>9679290

>>9677669
Apparently the 18-25 mean (IQ of 100) on CRT is .381 ms

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 17 Apr 2018 20:55:23 No.9679290 Report

Quoted By: >>9679478 >>9679579

>>9679250
>>9677525
I just did some basic math (if the 160 IQ man is for real), and I found this

IQ 160

.241 CRT

IQ 130

.311 CRT

IQ 100

.381 CRT

This is really interesting.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 17 Apr 2018 22:29:05 No.9679478 Report

Quoted By:

>>9679290
also keep in mind that the 18-25 people are mostly university students, and thus smarter.
this is also seen from their higher than average WAIS-IV matrix scores.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO Reaction.png, 35KiB, 843x569

Anonymous Tue 17 Apr 2018 22:57:18 No.9679549 Report

Quoted By:

2nd try

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO Screen Shot 2018-04-17 at 7.02.0 (...).png, 219KiB, 1512x1072

Anonymous Tue 17 Apr 2018 23:04:12 No.9679562 Report

Quoted By:

609mm head circumference, ~115 IQ based off mensa online tests, pic related = first and only attempt results

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 17 Apr 2018 23:12:49 No.9679579 Report

Quoted By: >>9681289

>>9679290
How is this score effected by the type of moniter you use? Cause I'm actually using a oled tv

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO sdfsdf.png, 133KiB, 1557x881

Anonymous Tue 17 Apr 2018 23:18:31 No.9679588 Report

Quoted By:

2nd try

Is it safe to say my Iq is like 105-110? I'm okay with this...

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 1523558260331.png, 824KiB, 679x1249

Anonymous Wed 18 Apr 2018 00:47:11 No.9679768 Report

Quoted By: >>9679814

>>9674197
Simple task: 301ms (error rate: 0%)
Multiple choice task: 479 (error rate: 0%)

I did the test with a handicap though -- it's almost 4 in the morning and I am very sleepy.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 18 Apr 2018 00:49:48 No.9679773 Report

Quoted By:

>>9674824
>The weird thing is that it's 117 IQ, but if you're 103 IQ and I can't best you, that means I'm probably 95-105 IQ too
That's not how correlations work.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 18 Apr 2018 00:51:03 No.9679777 Report

Quoted By:

>>9678005
>being this uneducated

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 18 Apr 2018 01:03:50 No.9679798 Report

Quoted By:

>>9678009
My IQ is like 104 too, but the last time I took the test was in 8th grade lol.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 18 Apr 2018 01:12:28 No.9679814 Report

Quoted By:

>>9679768
Oh, and my IQ is 140.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 1495494738083.png, 384KiB, 703x625

Anonymous Wed 18 Apr 2018 03:04:31 No.9679955 Report

Quoted By: >>9680022

>people actually think is connected to iq

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 18 Apr 2018 03:38:44 No.9680022 Report

Quoted By: >>9680166

>>9679955
t. slow brainlet arguing against legitimate research

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 1514133823976.png, 39KiB, 1896x606

Anonymous Wed 18 Apr 2018 04:54:33 No.9680166 Report

Quoted By:

>>9680022
I didn't read the instructions and fucked up part 2

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 18 Apr 2018 05:01:32 No.9680176 Report

Quoted By: >>9680181

i did ok :
220 ms on simple and like 500+ ms on the choice although i was doing it inefficiently.

i got a 720 on the SAT Verbal(critical reading) and a 680 on the math, no real amount of studying. attending a decent university

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 18 Apr 2018 05:04:42 No.9680181 Report

Quoted By:

>>9680176
also i talk pretty fast and can do arithmetic reasonably fast as well, and im definitely in a better state cognitively than i was when i took the SAT, so im surprised i was such a laggard on this test , but oh well

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 18 Apr 2018 09:21:01 No.9680540 Report

Quoted By:

237, 0% for SRT
308, 0% for CRT

This was my first try, though, I think I got slightly higher numbers my first time.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 18 Apr 2018 10:05:34 No.9680580 Report

Quoted By:

Tired but 247 ms, 334 ms. The problem with this test is that it depends on individual hardware. Keyboards all have wonky response times and can be 10-60 ms difference in response time. You would need to test everyone on the same hardware.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 18 Apr 2018 18:12:56 No.9681289 Report

Quoted By: >>9681865

>>9679579
Take off 30ms if you've got a 60 Hz monitor to get your raw reaction time, but those scores are grabbed from a 60 Hz monitor

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 18 Apr 2018 18:34:37 No.9681351 Report

Quoted By:

Anyone else ambidextrous posting here? I'm interested in the connection between these test results and left/right brain aptitude, given that the choice test depends on using both hands and the simple can use either hand. I scored 322 on simple and 325 0% error on choice and I feel like it's because I can use both hands equally. Did anyone who is right handed notice a significant increase in difficulty when pressing X or C, or did anyone who is left handed have more difficulty pressing B or N?

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 18 Apr 2018 19:22:31 No.9681474 Report

Quoted By:

Also if youre tall, youre at disadvantage, since the nerves to your hands are longer

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 18 Apr 2018 19:36:18 No.9681515 Report

Quoted By: >>9681535

267 SRT on 60 HZ monitor after 12+ hours awake and 10 $ keyboard (took me three tries to actually remain focused for more than 20 sec). Wont do the other one because i have ADD and am tired

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 18 Apr 2018 19:42:52 No.9681535 Report

Quoted By: >>9681877

>>9681515
Also. Mensa.no IQ test gives me 131, meanwhile hitting the upper limit on the Cambridge one. Alas, i tend to dominate on FPS and Hero shooters

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 18 Apr 2018 19:54:18 No.9681569 Report

Quoted By:

>>9674197
221 ms with 0%, 335 with 10%

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 18 Apr 2018 21:38:16 No.9681865 Report

Quoted By:

>>9681289
If those scores are grabbed from a 60hz monitor then why would I take off 30ms if I have a 60hz monitor?

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 18 Apr 2018 21:42:18 No.9681877 Report

Quoted By:

>>9681535
how do I unsubscribe from your blog

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Your latest searches