>>9033862>wow man you must be a genius but just too lazy!!I'd like you to point out in my post where I stated this.
I simply gave you a scenario which fulfilled the criterias you presented to us; a science-related podcast.
The criterias for intelligence you presented to us:
>stimulation by science>logical deduction>high memorization skills>good attention spanThe aforementioned science-related podcast fulfill the criterias presented by you to us.
One interested in that podcast obviously needs to be interested in science, which will require one to have constant logical deductions, since it's fucking science (stem fields, since it's what "logical deductions" implies most of the time), the person needs to be able to memorize a lot of things if one listens to that podcast constantly, and actually want to extract something out of it, and course, one needs to have a good attention span to endure hours of talking non-stop.
And then I asked you, without any malice, as you clearly interpreted, if by doing that will make me an intelligent person. I don't even know a "science-related podcast", this was a character I created to engage in a discussion with you. But now I see you clearly are not interested in that since all you did until now was bash people left and right with half-baked replies. Farewell, anon.
